Cover Story

Fault in Our Stars?

The issue with Pakistan does not lie in its inability to progress due to outside forces but instead in its inconsistency to become an honest nation.

By Fathima Sheikh | November 2024


On September 25th, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved Pakistan’s 25th bailout package. This time, it was a $7 billion loan to stabilize the country’s tumultuous economic atmosphere, further regressing due to its chaotic and disorderly politics. On October 21st, reports emerged that Pakistan had requested an additional $2 billion loan for its climate fund.

In 2023, the country’s growth was 2.4 percent, lower than the population growth rate of 2.6 percent. Tax revenue fell to 12 percent while expenditure was at a high 20 percent. The country also faced severely low exports, shrinking services exports by 6.51 percent. Meanwhile, imports rose significantly. All the while, direct foreign investments continued to plunge, throwing the entire country in a heavy deficit. This doomed picture of a deteriorating economy forced Pakistan to turn to the IMF for a bailout package with strict terms and conditions to alter fiscal policies, such as implementing a high tax increase without an exemption for retail, agriculture, and export sectors. The country has also vowed to sign a new national fiscal pact to improve its spending and fiscal discipline coordination. Through these changes, Pakistan hopes to rise above the sea level, regardless of how high it is.

However, one must note the nature of the hand that is being extended, for it, too, arrives under its own conditions. The IMF loan comes under the Fund’s ‘Extended Fund Facility’ that ‘provides financial assistance to countries facing serious medium-term balance of payments problems because of structural weaknesses. Apart from being heavily monitored, unlike the loans from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or the World Bank (WB), what is worth noting is the function of the IMF loan. It serves as a placeholder that fills the gap created by Pakistan’s insufficient fund reserves in the balance sheet rather than an actual sum of money that can be extracted and used. The loan comes with an interest rate payment that rises if the numbers further decline, and it is completely withdrawn once time’s up. In its most basic understanding, Pakistan’s government has subscribed to a 3-year ‘big loan’ subscription to balance the sheets; this ‘big loan’ will be withdrawn once the subscription expires, and we will once again force the country to reevaluate its economic condition without a plug-in. For years, it has only worsened.

The Pakistani delegation consisting of Secretary Finance Imdad Ullah Bosal and Governor State Bank of Pakistan Jameel Ahmed met the Deputy Managing Director of the IMF, Kenji Okamura, and claimed that the IMF loan will seek to resolute “fiscal consolidation, revenue expansion, energy, and SOE reforms” while there will be efforts within the country of “broadening the tax base, aligning the provincial Agriculture Income Tax regime with the federal income tax regime, rationalizing subsidies, rightsizing the government, and reducing energy sector costs.” However, an ominous truth now silently observed is that the severely militant and heavily unpredictable atmosphere of Pakistan’s political arena reeks of instability. Situated on the fault lines, surrounded by rich neighbors, the country continuously backslides, struggling with its governance whose ill fate has hindered growth.

Read More

2 thoughts on “Fault in Our Stars?

  • November 3, 2024 at 12:08 am
    Permalink

    Oh god!!! Thank you for explaining IMF injection to me… this was so so helpful

    Reply
  • November 3, 2024 at 7:18 pm
    Permalink

    Great read. Always a pleasure

    Reply