Region
Crisis of Governance
Pakistan must accept responsibility for the fiasco in the Reko Diq case and devise a co-ordinated strategy for dealing with international investments in future.
Pakistan is rich in natural resources and this is no exaggeration. Consider gold and copper. Historically, a substantial quantity of gold was sent to the Greeks as tax after Alexander came to know about the wealth in this part of the world. But where is the treasure? Take one example: Reko Diq, one of the largest copper mines in the world, having estimated reserves of 5.9 billion tons of ore grade reserves amounting to 41.5 million oz. According to experts, gold deposits exist wherever there are copper deposits. High deposits of copper is the actual reason for Reko Diq’s significance, but the reputation of Reko Diq is now associated with the Reko Diq court case.
An agreement, generally known as CHEJVA (Chagai Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement), was signed between the Australian mining company BHP Billiton and the Government of Balochistan in 1993. The purpose of the agreement was to allow BHP Billiton to explore the existence of copper and gold deposits at Reko Diq, conduct a feasibility study and later, the company would extract copper and gold from the site. BHP Biliton had 75% share in the deal while the rest was with the Government of Balochistan.
In 2000, BHP handed over the contract to another Australian company, Mincor Resources. Another company, TCC (Tethyan Copper Company), procured the project in 2006. Soon after TCC took control of the project, a lawsuit was filed in the Balochistan High Court against the agreement, stating that it was illegal and ran counter to the provisions of Pakistani law. However, the claim was discarded by the High Court and CHEJVA was declared legal and valid. The ripple effect did not fade out, though.
In 2010, TCC completed the feasibility study and shared its findings with the Government of Balochistan. Later, in 2011, TCC submitted a Mine Lease Application to receive formal permission for excavating the copper and gold as per the agreement. The lease application by TCC was turned down by the provincial government.
Reasons for the rejection included, i) smelting and refining to be done in Pakistan as opposed to the original agreement, in which smelting and refining was to be done outside Pakistan ii) increase in royalty rates iii) review of financial model iv) hiring more local population in the project.
TCC refused to revise the conditions. According to TCC, an amount of $220 million (had been invested by the time the Balochistan Provincial Government unexpectedly refused to grant them the mining lease. They demanded $11.43 billion in damages for such unanticipated and abrupt termination of the agreement. TCC took the matter to ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) and the World Bank Group. Moreover, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared the CHEJVA agreement as void and described it as contrary to public policy. The Supreme Court further stated that TCC had no legal rights to start excavation in Reko Diq. The decision of the Supreme Court was contrary to an earlier decision by the Balochistan High Court in 2006. In 2017, the ICSID passed a verdict in favour of TCC. The ICSID verdict approved a legitimate expectation of receiving the mining lease and found no wrongdoing in CHEJVA, the ground on which the Supreme Court of Pakistan ruled to terminate the agreement.
The ICSID also overruled dozens of allegations of corruption made by the Government of Pakistan against TCC. A case was filed against former Chief Minister of Balochistan, Muhammad Aslam Khan Raisani, who was said to have been offered a bribe of $1 million by TCC. Furthermore, ICSID found that Pakistan had unlawfully denied TCC a lease, breached Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) standards, and the State had committed unlawful expropriation under the Australia-Pakistan bilateral investment treaty. On these grounds, in 2019, the ICSID awarded $6bn in damages against Pakistan to TCC.
Pakistan was liable to pay the damages. To enforce the award, TCC approached the High Court of Justice in British Virgin Islands in 2020 and sought attachment of Pakistani assets belonging to PIAIL (Pakistan International Airlines Investment Ltd), a company which is also incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. The BVI High Court passed an order to attach some of PIAIL’s assets, including the Roosevelt Hotel in New York and the Scribe Hotel in Paris. Under the orders of the BVI High Court, the assets were frozen.
In December 2020, Pakistan initiated active negotiations with TCC to reach an out-of-court settlement of the dispute. In May 2021, the BVI High Court unfroze PIA assets in the Reko Diq award case. The ICSID, however, is still considering Pakistan’s appeal against the penalty over its decision to cancel the Reko Diq mining lease for TCC; a final hearing will take place some time in 2021.
Apparently the judgment passed by the BVI High Court looks like a legal triumph, but, in fact, the verdict of the ICSID carries more weight. Soon it will be disclosed whether the Pakistan Government had successfully settled the matter out of court with TCC, by issuing a lease contract, or paying $6bn in damages. Whatever happens, the dent to the image of Pakistan will not be removed so quickly. From now onwards, big international investors would be afraid of getting into contracts with Pakistan. It is of utmost importance to pinpoint people who did not perform a thorough strategic test of the project back in 1993. The real victory is restoring the image and that effort does not seem to be commencing soon.![]()

The writer is a columnist and broadcast journalist. He teaches at UVAS Business School in Lahore and can be reached at mali.hamza@yahoo.com


Leave a Reply