Kolkata
Didi in Danger
Despite her early successes, Mamata Banerjee’s third term as West Bengal’s Chief Minister has been marred by significant governance and administrative challenges.

In the ever-dynamic landscape of Indian politics, West Bengal remains one of the most politically vibrant and contentious states. At the center of this maelstrom stands Mamata Banerjee, the Chief Minister and leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), a formidable figure in regional and national politics. Her ascent to power marked the end of the Marxist-led Left Front’s 34-year rule, and her government has since overseen significant socio-political transformations.
However, recent developments, ranging from communal unrest to corruption allegations, have prompted questions over whether her administration is beginning to unravel. While her leadership faces mounting challenges, it would be premature to pronounce the decline of her political stronghold. Instead, the situation reflects a reckoning moment that will test her governance and adaptability.
Mamata Banerjee emerged as a symbol of populist resistance, famously ousting the Left Front in 2011 after decades of communist rule. Her party, the TMC, capitalized on grassroots mobilization, promises of pro-poor governance, and opposition to centralization of power. Over the years, her administration has implemented several welfare schemes such as Kanyashree, Sabooj Sathi, and Swasthya Sathi, earning international and domestic acclaim. These initiatives bolstered her popularity, especially among women and rural communities, reinforcing her image as “Didi,” the protector of the common people.
However, despite her early successes, Banerjee’s third term in office has been marred by a surfeit of significant governance and administrative challenges, casting a shadow over Didi’s political achievements. These challenges have now led political analysts and the opposition alike to believe that Banerjee’s rule is beginning to unravel. Among the most significant of these challenges is the persistent corruption scandals. The so-called ‘Syndicate Raj’ — an alleged network of politically connected contractors and hospital administrators involved in illegal organ trafficking and kickbacks — has significantly eroded public trust in the integrity of institutions.
Moreover, the government has come under intense scrutiny due to the glaring institutional decay that has become evident in its response to critical cases, such as the rape and murder of the junior doctor in Kolkata. The failure to swiftly and effectively address the crime, compounded by the lenient sentencing in the case, exposed systemic flaws within both the judicial and law enforcement frameworks. This decay has led to widespread disillusionment, as vital institutions meant to protect citizens and ensure justice have instead allowed corruption, negligence, and bias to take root. The public outcry that followed ultimately forced the state to challenge the verdict in higher courts, revealing just how deep-rooted these institutional failures have become.
Parallel to this, another significant challenge facing the state has been the growing communal tension, which has been exacerbated by political and social divides. This tension has manifested in violent protests and widespread unrest, often highlighting the state’s inability to address these issues and maintain peace effectively. A notable example was the severe communal unrest in Murshidabad in April 2025, where protests erupted over the Waqf (Amendment) Act. The incident exposed vulnerabilities in law enforcement, raised concerns about radicalization, and attracted criticism from opposition parties, along with warnings from Governor C.V. Ananda Bose.
A further complicating challenge for Banerjee has been the escalating tensions between the state and the central government. The ongoing confrontation has been marked by Banerjee’s repeated accusations against New Delhi, alleging political vendetta, undue interference in state matters, and the withholding of crucial funds. These factors have not only deepened the federal divide but also exacerbated the polarization of the electorate, making it increasingly difficult for the state government to navigate its relationship with the center.
Banerjee faces the intensifying opposition from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has persistently scrutinized her administration. The BJP has capitalized on allegations of corruption, violence, and lawlessness within the state, painting the TMC government as ineffective and corrupt. With a growing support base in urban areas, the BJP taps into rising disillusionment with TMC’s governance, although it continues to struggle with presenting a strong, locally accepted leader as an alternative to Banerjee. The BJP has also seized on accusations of electoral violence, intimidation, and murder, particularly during the 2021 elections, further damaging TMC’s reputation.
Banerjee’s bane does not end with administrative lapses and institutional erosion; it is compounded by the relentless offensive mounted by the BJP, the principal opposition force in the state. The BJP has systematically targeted her government with allegations of corruption, electoral violence, and a breakdown of law and order. Its rising support base—particularly in urban constituencies—reflects a growing disenchantment with the Trinamool Congress’s governance. Though the BJP lacks a credible, locally rooted leadership alternative, it has successfully tapped into public frustration.
The 2026 assembly elections will serve as a critical referendum not just on Mamata Banerjee’s governance, but on the broader trajectory of West Bengal’s political evolution.
Yet, despite the turmoil, Mamata Banerjee demonstrates political agility and resilience. She has boldly set a target of winning over 215 seats in the 2026 assembly elections and has reiterated her decision to contest independently, distancing the TMC from the Congress-led INDIA alliance. This calculated move allows her to reassert her regional autonomy and counter the narrative of being overly reliant on national coalitions. Her political instincts remain finely tuned to Bengal’s unique socio-cultural ethos. By championing regional pride and presenting herself as the bulwark against both central overreach and communal politics, she maintains significant sway among key voter blocs.
The future of Mamata Banerjee’s rule hangs in a delicate balance. While her popularity remains intact in several quarters, the convergence of governance failures, public unrest, and corruption scandals poses serious risks to her political legitimacy. Her response to these challenges—whether through reform, transparency, or mere political maneuvering—will determine whether her rule consolidates or fractures. The 2026 assembly elections will serve as a critical referendum not just on her governance, but on the broader trajectory of West Bengal’s political evolution. Her ability to weather the storm may depend on how effectively she can reconnect with disillusioned constituents, revamp administrative accountability, and neutralize growing opposition narratives.
To conclude, Mamata Banerjee’s administration in West Bengal is under significant strain, facing the dual burdens of governance lapses and rising public dissent. However, to declare her rule as “unravelling” would be an oversimplification. What unfolds in the coming months may well determine the shape of Bengal’s political future—and test whether “Didi” can once again reinvent herself in the face of adversity.![]()
Salis Malik is a freelance journalist and columnist based in Islamabad. He can be reached on Facebook @salismalik7777


Leave a Reply