Kolkata

Didi in Danger

Despite her early successes, Mamata Banerjee’s third term as West Bengal’s Chief Minister has been marred by significant governance and administrative challenges.

By Salis Malik | July 2025


In the ever-dynamic landscape of Indian politics, West Bengal remains one of the most politically vibrant and contentious states. At the center of this maelstrom stands Mamata Banerjee, the Chief Minister and leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), a formidable figure in regional and national politics. Her ascent to power marked the end of the Marxist-led Left Front’s 34-year rule, and her government has since overseen significant socio-political transformations.

However, recent developments, ranging from communal unrest to corruption allegations, have prompted questions over whether her administration is beginning to unravel. While her leadership faces mounting challenges, it would be premature to pronounce the decline of her political stronghold. Instead, the situation reflects a reckoning moment that will test her governance and adaptability.

Mamata Banerjee emerged as a symbol of populist resistance, famously ousting the Left Front in 2011 after decades of communist rule. Her party, the TMC, capitalized on grassroots mobilization, promises of pro-poor governance, and opposition to centralization of power. Over the years, her administration has implemented several welfare schemes such as Kanyashree, Sabooj Sathi, and Swasthya Sathi, earning international and domestic acclaim. These initiatives bolstered her popularity, especially among women and rural communities, reinforcing her image as “Didi,” the protector of the common people.

However, despite her early successes, Banerjee’s third term in office has been marred by a surfeit of significant governance and administrative challenges, casting a shadow over Didi’s political achievements. These challenges have now led political analysts and the opposition alike to believe that Banerjee’s rule is beginning to unravel. Among the most significant of these challenges is the persistent corruption scandals. The so-called ‘Syndicate Raj’ — an alleged network of politically connected contractors and hospital administrators involved in illegal organ trafficking and kickbacks — has significantly eroded public trust in the integrity of institutions.

Moreover, the government has come under intense scrutiny due to the glaring institutional decay that has become evident in its response to critical cases, such as the rape and murder of the junior doctor in Kolkata. The failure to swiftly and effectively address the crime, compounded by the lenient sentencing in the case, exposed systemic flaws within both the judicial and law enforcement frameworks. This decay has led to widespread disillusionment, as vital institutions meant to protect citizens and ensure justice have instead allowed corruption, negligence, and bias to take root. The public outcry that followed ultimately forced the state to challenge the verdict in higher courts, revealing just how deep-rooted these institutional failures have become.

Parallel to this, another significant challenge facing the state has been the growing communal tension, which has been exacerbated by political and social divides. This tension has manifested in violent protests and widespread unrest, often highlighting the state’s inability to address these issues and maintain peace effectively. A notable example was the severe communal unrest in Murshidabad in April 2025, where protests erupted over the Waqf (Amendment) Act. The incident exposed vulnerabilities in law enforcement, raised concerns about radicalization, and attracted criticism from opposition parties, along with warnings from Governor C.V. Ananda Bose.

A further complicating challenge for Banerjee has been the escalating tensions between the state and the central government. The ongoing confrontation has been marked by Banerjee’s repeated accusations against New Delhi, alleging political vendetta, undue interference in state matters, and the withholding of crucial funds. These factors have not only deepened the federal divide but also exacerbated the polarization of the electorate, making it increasingly difficult for the state government to navigate its relationship with the center.

Read More