Cover Story

Conditions on the ground do not indicate the established rationale for the formation of a national government.

The imposition of an unelected ‘National Government of Technocrats’ is likely to do more harm than good.

A national government, riding upon the back of the Establishment’s strength, would be a far cry from people’s wishes, for it has never been able and willing to, nor will it carry out the essential reforms in all, but especially the governance and economic sectors.

The militarisation of governance and public affairs can never be conceived as an ideal remedy. However, a democratic dispensation can learn a lot from the military leadership, particularly in the areas of good administration and sound stewardship.

The frequent regime changes in Pakistan have less to do with incompetence and more to do with the execution of the ‘Economic Hit Man’ policies.

Rahul Gandhi has shed his cloak of the remote, arrogant, and unrelatable icon of the Gandhi dynasty and is reaching out to people from all walks of life, especially farmers.

A third consecutive victory will further embolden Narendra Modi, who is not only inspired by rising Christian fascism in the USA and Europe and Zionist fascism in Israel but is also encouraged by these like-minded allies to turn India into a hellhole for minorities.

Rahul Gandhi has emerged as a ray of hope for the people of India in general and for the Indian National Congress in particular.

Pakistanis today are worse off than they were twenty years ago, and ironically, the World Bank is still somehow “providing relief” to the country. This begs us to ponder: what is the crux of the matter? And why has this noble intervention failed Pakistan?

The World Bank and the IMF have played a pivotal role in shaping the global economic landscape and improving the lives of millions in Pakistan and South Asia.

The pros and cons of IMF programmes and World Bank loans have been widely debated across the globe.

As the World Bank and the IMF hold their annual meetings in October, the former would be pressed to move into new activities. The most important change will be to provide funding to the developing world, including Pakistan.

Despite the two major PDM parties believing that ruling the country is their legal inheritance and its people exist to do their bidding, the caretaker government has a sacred duty to fulfil.

The evolving environment may push Pakistan from a hybrid democracy to a praetorian rule. In that case, Pakistan may be prone to either follow the example of the government in Myanmar, or it may become an Egypt of South Asia, obviously with catastrophic consequences.

It is an open secret known across the legislative, judiciary, and executive branches of Pakistan that for every organ of the state, the written law is far different from the ground reality.

The events of the past few months have made it clear even to the most dense that the will of the people has nothing to do with the way their country is governed.

The Caretaker Government must be authentically impartial, not an extension of the post-April 2022 arrangement: ECP should take a lead role in ensuring this neutrality.

Any unconstitutional move by any one of the institutions would have disastrous effects on the security, internal stability, economy and international standing of Pakistan.

There is no indication of the political parties gearing up for the hustings yet. The usual electioneering that should have started by now, with just weeks left for the dissolution of the National Assembly, is all quite inexplicable. So, what is cooking in the corridors of power?

Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Pakistan’s former prime minister, was recently interviewed by a leading news channel. The following are the excerpts taken from the interview.

The symbiotic Pakistan-U.S. defence relationship created a perfect need-based fix – one partner needed war to achieve its ambitions of hegemony while the other was addicted to weapons and petro-dollars.