Cover Story

Like People, Like Rulers!

The frequent regime changes in Pakistan have less to do with incompetence and more to do with the execution of the ‘Economic Hit Man’ policies.

By Brig. (R) Saleem Qamar Butt | December 2023

Appeared in the SouthAsia Magazine (https://southasia.com.pk/), in my last article titled, “Good Cop, Bad Cop,” I undertook a brief overview of Pakistan’s political history with a focus on analysing the reasons for the perpetual failure of successive governments in the country. It is satisfying to note that the opinion paper has stirred valuable discussions on the subject.

One exciting thought received states, “Though it sounds theoretically wrong but practically right, the role of the Armed Forces in Pakistani politics has always led to exciting outcomes since the men in khaki, when in power, have fared better than their civilian counterparts, especially when it comes to economic revival and development. Is it because of the competence of the Armed Forces or the incompetence of the democratically-elected leadership that keeps failing Pakistan on the economic front again and again?” I consider it a stimulating but debatable avowal that can either be proved right or wrong depending on which side of the aisle one prefers to stand. Nonetheless, dispassionate scrutiny may help to filter out the proper perspective.

Let’s begin with the post-mortem of the above thematic proclamation. A paragraph from my above-referred article is considered enough to challenge the given notion: “In Pakistan, if the country’s three main political parties, namely the PPP, the PML-N, and the PTI, have each failed to govern well (especially concerning economic revival), we need to ask, why? Is there a problem with the stated three political parties or with the three main organs of the state, i.e., Legislature, Judiciary, and the Executives, who are mostly found attempting to function out of the respective constitutional orbits? Is it because of the application of the colonial mindset, strategy, and tactics by the three pillars of the state on the hapless public who is to be served well and not to be misruled? Is there a problem with our stars or with us? Is there a problem with the system of governance or with the unfair and self-serving men in the system? Is it due to the lack of competence or the frail character of licentious power grabbers? Is it a case of “like people, like rulers” or “jaisaa raja waisi prajaa”? Or is it a backlash of failure to learn from the experience of others and even from our own major national strategic blunders, e.g., October 1958, December 1970/71, July 1977, April 1979, October 1999, September 2001, April 2022, and May 2023? A democracy is a society where citizens are sovereign and control the government; did it ever happen in Pakistan?”

The global political history testifies that “Power doesn’t corrupt. Fear corrupts... perhaps the fear of a loss of power.” Our personal friendships and narcissistic biases notwithstanding, how can an unconstitutional military rule, even under the most compelling environment and with a hundred justifying reasons, be accredited with an “exciting outcome?” Doesn’t our history of military takeovers and their disastrous outcomes cull this misperceived notion? In its chequered history of 76 years, Pakistan has had 32 prime ministers (from Khan Liaquat Ali Khan to Imran Khan, Shehbaz Sharif, and the incumbent caretaker PM).

There have been thirteen Presidents of Pakistan since the post’s introduction in 1956. Six presidents have been members of a political party, and four were active party members of the Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP). The first president was a retired military officer; four others were incumbent military officers, of which three gained power through successful military coups in Pakistan’s history – Field Marshal Ayub Khan (27 October 1958 to 31 March 1969: left Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, PPP, and Gen. Yahya Khan as a legacy…accumulated aftermath was the loss of former East Pakistan), General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq (16 September 1978 to 17 August 1988: left Nawaz Sharif and PML(N), and millions of disillusioned Jihadi elements as his unrelentingly haunting legacy) and General Pervez Musharraf (20 June 2001 to 18 August 2008: left behind PML(Q), MQM, vicious NROs, and consequent boosted turncoats culture; besides, the inevitable backlash of embroiling in so-called War on Terror playing as a second fiddle to US).

The illusory and transient economic stability and development during these stated military rules is attributable more to the flow of American dollars paid for playing the self-destructive cat’s paw roles assigned to Pakistan, highly profitable only for the ruling elite and their fraternity of multiple hues and colours.

The frequent regime changes in Pakistan have less to do with incompetence, and more to do with the execution of the ‘Economic Hit Man’ policies managed through embedded slaves. No amount of distortion of history and whitewash can hide how and who always created a conducive environment and choreographed events, which were made to be seen, heard, and believed by the wretched public and even academia, media, chosen political pygmies and the well-rewarded elements among all the pillars of the state. Sadly, these elements continue even with greater vigor to project the menace as a messianic reward; as Henry Kissinger said, “Corrupt politicians make the other ten percent look bad.”

Read More