Cover Story

Landslides:
Dark sides --- and a Bright side!

All the initial signs emanating from Dhaka in the glow of the big win herald hope for a constructive use of the strong mandate

By Senator (r) Javed Jabbar | March 2026


On the face of it, a landslide is like a knock-out.

But what if the opponent is not inside the ring? Because s/he was not allowed to fight.

Even if that opponent had already exhibited such malignant unsportslike attributes that pre-bout disqualification was quite justified. Yet in an electoral context, there is a need to look beyond the unilateral, monolithic dimension of a landslide.

The winning of 209 seats out of 299 by the BNP in the 12th February 2026 polls in Bangladesh is a potent indicator of popularity. But even setting aside for the moment the non-participation of a major contestant like the Awami League, this writer is incorrigibly skeptical about the first-past-the-post electoral system used by Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, and many others. The system is selectively electoral and does not represent all voters, or even the majority of voters.

Only compulsory voting:
Only the system of compulsory voting long advocated by self --- as used in about 23 countries e.g. Singapore, Australia, Greece, Belgium, Argentina, to name only 5 --- and (my personal favourite!) the requirement that the winner must secure at least 50 per cent of the cast vote plus at least one more vote, to be an authentic representative of the majority --- these two features alone ensure that poll results become truly representative of the views of all citizens eligible to vote.

The total number of registered voters in Bangladesh in 2026 is 127 million. The relatively high turnout was a fraction less than 60 per cent, at 59.44 per cent. Yet that still means 40 per cent --- numbering about 50 million adults --- did not bother to vote at all. Possibly, a large number of those who stayed away were a deliberate boycott, such as by supporters of the banned Awami League. Or from apathy, or other insurmountable reasons.

Not a popular vote landslide:
BNP received about 38 million votes. Which was an impressive 50 per cent of the votes actually cast. But if we take into account those who did not vote at all, then the BNP received only 30 per cent of the total registered votes. While securing a two-thirds majority of seats, i.e., 209 out of 299. Which is yet another indicator of the non-representative nature of the first-past-the-post electoral system without compulsory voting.

Because the inconvenient fact is that an almost overwhelming majority of registered voters, i.e., about 80 million, did NOT vote for the BNP, which received about 38 million votes. The 80 million non-BNP voters comprised those who voted for other parties in 2026 (about 28/30 million) and those who did not vote at all (about 50 million).

There is a bizarre coincidence here. In 1970, the voter turnout of 59.8 percent was almost the same as in 2026, i.e., 59.44 percent. At that time in 1970, when there were only 56.9 million registered voters, 39.2 percent of then-eligible voters did not vote at all, and about 11 percent voted against the Awami League, totalling about HALF --- or 50 percent of all voters --- who did NOT vote for the Awami League. Yet the AL won 160 out of 162 seats from East Pakistan, i.e., 98.7 percent. The first-past-the-post system does not even deserve one cheer, leave alone three.

For the record: in the 2024 polls which were boycotted by BNP, and which, among others, the US State Department called “not free or fair,” and in which the voter turnout was only 41.8 percent out of then-registered 119 million voters, the Awami League --- despite enjoying all the advantages of State power and the absence of the BNP --- received only 32.1 million votes.

Landslide inside the Assembly:
In electorally enabling law-making terms, the BNP in 2026 certainly has a two-thirds majority. But even assuming that such a big margin will assure a term of office that is free of bumps, potholes, ditches, a landslide brings with it real, as well as unforeseeable uncertainty and hazards.

Read More