Cover Story
Cost of Denialism
Disenfranchisement of a political party is synonymous to dispossessing your own people of their constitutional freedom to express their political inclination… and quite literally, orphaning them, the same way that the Bengalis in East Pakistan were orphaned and discarded.
Theoretically, in the psychology of human behaviour, Denialism is a person’s choice to deny reality as a way to negate uncomfortable truths. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality.
I find it ironic how this psychological discourse so befittingly defines the contemporary condition that we as a nation are confronting. As a nation, most of the time, we are all in denial. A perpetual illusion that we have carved of our own persists large as part of our collective conscience in a whole new way, through which we have improvised the technique of viewing the world the way we deem fit. Denial seems to be the all-encompassing panacea to the prevalent problems befalling us as a country, as individuals, as nation.
In the words of Sigmund Freud, no one wants to be accused of being “in denial”, and labelling people as denialists seems to compound insult, for it implies that they have taken the private sickness of denial and turned it into public dogma. Yes – a dogma. We do not anymore require to be part of an interest group, or a cult, or a political wing to behave in this manner because the very edifice upon which the entire structure of our society rests is naturally surrounded by this plague-like dogma. It is indeed a matter of pity that we as people are too good when it comes to analysing other countries, other cultures, other faiths.
We seem to have perfect understanding around how nations rebuilt themselves after having been completely decimated. Even our quintessential street hawker and rickshaw driver on the street will quote examples of Germany, Japan, and South Korea on how these countries reversed the odds to their advantage and emerged as developed nations. They will describe how following the most ignominious defeat in the history of the world, Germany reconstructed and pivoted itself towards becoming one of the most developed countries within a span of just three decades. They will tell you how Japan —the only country to ever suffer from the catastrophe of atom bombs pulverizing it through and through— got back on its feet, and in such a way that today Japan, in terms of economy and industry is amongst the eight biggest countries of the world.
When it comes to revisiting the pages of our own history, a huge percentage of our social calendar including the educated and the elite amongst us, opine that “such incidents” are now no more worth remembering. To them, it is tantamount to wastage of time only. Instead of soul-searching, and culling relevant lessons from our past, we are still engaged in the futile exercise of finding excuses on one pretext or another.
The 1969 mass uprising in the then East Pakistan.
The dilemma of 1971 is the gravest, singular incident that resulted in the cessation of this country. This was a defeat cum failure that, in spirit, crippled us and has stamped an indelible scar upon the canvas of our existence. We still seem to be deluded in utter confusion debating on whether was it 34,000 soldiers or 90,000? Instead of drawing inference from what history has to teach us, we even have the gall to keep bickering around whether the defeat was due to a political failure, or a military one? As if these two are associated with two separate countries.
We seem to be perennially engaged in inventing an argot of sorts that renders the entire event looking like an international saazish, to which we are the poor victims. Using colloquial lexicon, and pieces of scattered information to our advantage, we seem to be enthralled in a collective endeavour to reclothe the biggest disaster; a collective national failure that resulted in the country snagging in two. Indeed a strange way of dealing with what historically presents a perfect ‘truth’ into something that we want to believe in; “I am a skilled ship captain of a great ship that can never sink…” knowing fully that the engine of my ship doesn’t crank at all. By turning a blind eye towards our mistakes, follies, and shortcomings, who are we trying to hoodwink?
From looking back at Manekshaw’s interviews praising the individual action of our junior officers and soldiers, to referring to (Sarmila) Bose’s narrative delineating the atrocities against non-Bengali masses by Mukti Bahini, or simply by shifting the blame to acerbic geographical distance between the eastern and the western wings, we seem to be perpetually in a state of denial, not wanting to admit that mistakes were made. Our reluctance to accept that it were we who waged a war against our very own people first, giving the enemy an opportunity to strike at the right time and space to go for the kill, still seems to be the official belief. How complicated is it to understand that following a general elections, the party winning more seats is rightfully supposed to form a government?
Pakistanis continue to think they probably have a special favour from God, and owing to this delusion, we feel that ‘no power on earth can undo us’.
In the elections of December 1970, the Awami league of Sheikh Mujeeb ur Rahman claimed 160 seats out of a total 162 seats in East Pakistan, whereas the PPP of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto could only settle for 81 out of the 138 seats in the western part. Instead of transferring power to the winner candidate, we witnessed a strange, uncalled for indignation in West Pakistan that eventually resulted in Awami League’s disqualification, its party members labelled as traitors on various charges upheld against the state. The legislative assembly session which was to be convened on 3rd March 1971 was criminally held back without giving a future date. This resulted in a great unrest, pushing Mujeeb into initiating widespread protests in East Pakistan.
To make matters worse, Mujeeb was arrested on 25th March 71. Yahya’s Government declared 78 NA seats of East Pakistan vacant, ordering by-elections, however, owing to deteriorating law and order situation, this was not possible. Resultantly, these seats were adjusted in the closed rooms of Head Quarters Eastern Command, and conveniently dished out to Muslim league, Jamaat-e-Islami and the PPP. On the 26th, military action was ordered in East Pakistan, and this was how a war against our own people was waged.
Ethno-centric sub-nationalism is not an unusual phenomenon. It is an intrinsic component of multi-ethnic and poly-lingual societies. It needs not become a hindrance to national integration, provided a significant deal of tolerance and accommodation is shown, even if one of the constituent units happens to be located in a different geographic zone. Typically saying, minorities struggle against an oppressive rule of the majority for their rights. This was, however, a bizarre occasion, thanks to our ‘dominant-subordinate syndrome,’ where, for the first time in the history of the world, a majority was coerced into parting ways. This, in itself was a testimony of the fact that instead of being a nation, it was a colonization of sorts, wherein the minority ruled over the majority on the basis of ethnic division. What happened next is history.
Juxtaposed with today’s political situation we see ourselves standing on the same juncture, where criminally the entire state machinery with all its possible brutality is seen in full swing to suppress the vox populi in a visible effort to deny the rightful share to a party with the largest mandate. Today, we witness the same absence of sense among the controlling elite, even when the reality has unveiled before their very eyes.
No army in the world can win a war over its own people. Yet, in the castles of our imagination, our invincibility doesn’t seem to meet an end. Anyone who has the audacity to defy and speak the truth does it at the cost of being labelled as unpatriotic. In the words of Steven T Byington, “it must never be unpatriotic to support your country against your government. It must always be unpatriotic to support your government against your country”. Pakistanis continue to think they probably have a special favour from God, and owing to this delusion, we feel that ‘no power on earth can undo us’. In my opinion, nothing defines “undone” better than being split into two.
History only repeats itself when one neglectfully chooses not to heed from it and sternly refuses to learn from his own past. With time, he begins to internalize the flawed perception that he probably never faltered in the first place, and so there is a very serious problem with this kind of an ideology. The very act of not accepting mistakes, gauds one into becoming uncritical of himself, making him feed his unchecked, dark reservoir of pomposity, arrogance and self-taught illusions.
Defeat and failure are not to be looked at as a condemnable occasion; in fact it is the best teacher to cull inspiration from. All developed countries of today have tasted failures and defeats at some point in time in history, but in order for it to teach you, you must first accept it. It is only after you accept your defeat that you learn from where you went wrong, and how you must never trip over those stones in your pathway again. This is how learning from past mistakes pivoted Germany and many other leading countries towards where they stand today.
Disenfranchisement of a political party is synonymous to dispossessing your own people of their constitutional freedom to express their political inclination… and quite literally, orphaning them, the same way that the Bengalis in East Pakistan were orphaned and discarded.
Perhaps it’s high time that we put an end to hollow slogans, euphoric assumptions and rhetorical innuendos that have blinded us towards our follies all these years, and open our eyes to see past mistakes as an important lesson to learn from. Muzzling, baton-charging and bludgeoning our very own people into submission against their very will, would just push us, irreversibly, into a dark abyss forever.
The writer is a historian and a critical analyst. He can be reached at arslan9h@gmail.com
NBP continues to support farmers
IMF Comes to the Rescue
Qatar, UAE to Reopen Embassies
Adnan Siddiqui calls out Priyanka Chopra
India becomes the most populous country of the world
Mercedes launched with a price tag of Rs 3.30 crore... only
HBL signs agreement for Prime Minister’s Youth Business and Agriculture Loan Scheme
Saudi FM meets Assad on first trip to Syria since 2011
Ramazan and Eid Boost Pakistan’s Remittances
it was always interested to read articles from Col Arslan sb who always bring the realities on the front
Very well reflected the past unfortunate mistakes & not learning yet from the sad history.
The article has a depth for those who would like to learn.
Very Well analyzed past & present 👍