Region 
 

Faisalabad

Policy Coherence For Industrial Transformation

A cohesive trade, industry, and tariff framework is not merely beneficial, but a fundamental prerequisite for sustainable economic growth

By M. Abbas Raza | September 2026

Trade, industrial, export promotion, and tariff policies are four pillars of economic development and competitiveness. Although distinct, they are interdependent and should operate as components of a unified national development strategy. In Pakistan, where tariffs remain important instruments for regulating imports, protecting domestic industries, influencing investment, promoting exports, and generating revenue, coordination among these policies is particularly critical. Yet for decades, they have largely been formulated in isolation, resulting in fragmented decisions, inconsistent incentives, and weak long-term industrial outcomes.

Pakistan has not implemented a comprehensive National Industrial Policy since 1984. Draft policies prepared in 1990, 1994, 2007, and 2011 were never formally adopted, while the current policy has remained under preparation for several years. In their absence, successive governments have relied on sector-specific initiatives covering fertilisers, mobile devices, SMEs, and automobiles. Although these have produced isolated gains, they have not provided the coherent direction required for structural transformation, technological upgrading, and export-led industrialisation.

This fragmentation extends to tariff and trade policy. Tariff reforms are frequently introduced through annual Finance Acts and Statutory Regulatory Orders, often to meet short-term fiscal objectives rather than long-term industrial priorities. Free and Preferential Trade Agreements have similarly been negotiated without sufficiently comprehensive assessments of their impact on domestic industries or consistency with national industrial objectives. Fiscal, energy, investment, and export policies have also evolved independently, often pursuing conflicting rather than mutually reinforcing objectives.

The consequences are evident throughout the economy. Tariff structures have not consistently provided appropriate preferences for raw materials, intermediate goods, components, and capital machinery required for high-value-added manufacturing. Many manufacturers therefore face unnecessarily high production costs, making it difficult to meet international quality, SPS, and TBT requirements or integrate into global value chains. Industries receiving tariff protection may subsequently lose it through concessions negotiated under FTAs or PTAs, creating uncertainty and undermining investor confidence.

Manufacturing requires substantial capital investment and long planning horizons. Frequent changes in tariffs, taxation, import regulations, incentives, and trade policies increase regulatory risk and discourage long-term investment, particularly foreign direct investment. Investors favour stable, predictable environments; inconsistent signals have often diverted investment towards short-term commercial activities rather than manufacturing capable of generating employment, technology transfer, exports, and diversification.

Fragmented policymaking has also weakened industrial competitiveness. High energy prices, expensive financing, technological backwardness, inadequate logistics, weak innovation, and inappropriate tariff structures have increased production costs. Some industries consequently operate below efficient scale, while others struggle to compete with imported finished products. Potentially competitive sectors may receive insufficient support, whereas less efficient industries sometimes continue to receive protection without corresponding improvements in productivity or competitiveness.

Exports face similar structural weaknesses. High input costs, limited technological upgrading, inadequate compliance with international standards, and insufficient integration into global value chains have constrained diversification. Pakistan remains heavily dependent on a narrow range of traditional exports while failing to develop globally competitive engineering goods, electronics, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, machinery, and other higher-value-added industries. Imports therefore continue to outpace exports, widening trade deficits and contributing to de-industrialisation, slower productivity growth, and limited employment generation.


Another major weakness is the limited use of rigorous economic analysis in policymaking. Major tariff reforms, industrial incentives, and trade agreements are rarely preceded by comprehensive assessments of competitiveness, effective protection, employment, export potential, fiscal implications, and investment outcomes. Post-implementation evaluations are also uncommon, allowing ineffective policies to persist. Such reactive policymaking weakens institutional credibility and confidence in the Government’s ability to provide a stable, evidence-based environment for industrial development.

The National Tariff Policy 2025–2030 and the Finance Acts of 2025 and 2026 represent important steps towards tariff rationalisation and lower trade taxes. However, although these reforms emphasise competitiveness, exports, and investment, they do not yet establish a coherent strategy linking tariff reform with industrial development, technological upgrading, productivity, employment, and strategic sectoral transformation. Following extensive tariff rationalisation, questions also arise about which policy instruments will remain available to support the forthcoming National Industrial Policy.

Industrial policy should therefore become the overarching framework within which trade, tariff, export promotion, investment, technology, education, infrastructure, and energy policies are coordinated. It should identify priority sectors based on comparative and competitive advantage, establish measurable productivity and export targets, encourage technological modernisation, promote research and innovation, facilitate industrial finance, and create quality employment. Trade policy should strengthen international market integration, while export promotion should reduce production costs, expand market access, and enhance competitiveness. Tariff policy should support these objectives through a transparent, predictable structure that encourages value addition rather than merely maximising short-term revenue.

Pakistan’s long-term challenge is not simply to formulate better individual policies but to establish a governance framework in which industrial, trade, tariff, investment, and export policies operate in harmony to achieve shared national objectives

Recent findings in the Pakistan Economic Survey 2025–26 indicate encouraging recovery. Manufacturing, particularly Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM), has responded to improved macroeconomic stability, easing inflation, exchange-rate stability, and stronger business confidence. Construction and mining have also expanded, providing a foundation for sustained industrial growth.

Nevertheless, macroeconomic stabilisation alone cannot sustain long-term industrial transformation. High energy costs, expensive financing, fragmented policymaking, technological gaps, declining domestic energy production, regulatory uncertainty, and weak institutional coordination continue to constrain productivity, employment, and export diversification. Pakistan therefore requires an integrated framework aligning industrial, tariff, trade, investment, and export-promotion policies with a coherent national development strategy.

These objectives should also guide international trade negotiations. Every major tariff revision, industrial incentive, trade concession, and FTA should be evaluated against clearly defined industrial objectives. Trade agreements should reinforce rather than undermine domestic industrial development, while tariff policy should provide stable incentives for investment, technological upgrading, and value-added manufacturing. Existing agreements should be periodically reviewed for consistency with national development priorities.

Effective implementation requires a permanent institutional coordination mechanism involving the Ministry of Commerce, the Ministry of Industries, the National Tariff Commission, the Federal Board of Revenue, the Engineering Development Board, the Board of Investment, the Planning Commission, relevant sectoral ministries, and private-sector representatives. Major policy decisions should be preceded by comprehensive ex ante impact assessments covering industrial competitiveness, exports, employment, investment, fiscal revenues, and Pakistan’s international obligations.

A stable, predictable policy environment must be central to economic governance. Investors require multi-year frameworks rather than frequent annual changes. A transparent tariff roadmap, supported by economic analysis, monitoring, and measurable indicators, should guide adjustments, with industrial output, export diversification, productivity, investment, employment, and effective rates of protection forming the basis of evaluation.

Pakistan possesses a large domestic market, human resources, entrepreneurial capacity, a strategic location, and natural resources. Its principal challenge is policy coherence; sustainable industrial growth requires coordinated government action rather than isolated interventions.

To translate these recommendations into sustainable transformation, Pakistan should adopt a National Industrial Policy supported by a ten-year implementation framework. The policy should provide strategic direction while ensuring continuity, policy certainty, and long-term investor confidence beyond annual budgets and short-term stabilisation programmes.

To ensure effective coordination, the Government should establish a National Industrial Competitiveness Council, chaired by the Prime Minister and comprising representatives of relevant ministries, economic institutions, provincial governments, and the private sector. The Council should provide strategic oversight, resolve inter-ministerial inconsistencies, monitor implementation, and periodically review progress against national industrial objectives.

The policy should identify priority sectors based on Pakistan’s comparative and competitive advantages and develop sector-specific strategies for industries offering strong potential for value addition, employment, technological advancement, and export growth. These should include engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, electronics, automobiles, information technology, food processing, textiles, and renewable-energy equipment, with defined investment, technology, infrastructure, and export objectives.

A stable, transparent, and predictable tariff regime must form an integral part of this strategy. Tariff policy should no longer be driven primarily by short-term fiscal considerations. It should facilitate access to competitively priced raw materials, intermediate goods, machinery, and technology, encourage domestic value addition, and provide appropriate protection for strategically important industries where justified.

Industrial competitiveness also requires internationally competitive energy prices. Electricity and gas tariffs for manufacturing should therefore be rationalised to reduce production costs, improve productivity, encourage investment, and strengthen Pakistan’s position relative to regional competitors.

Industrial modernisation requires long-term capital. The Government should expand affordable industrial finance through development finance institutions and commercial banks. A National Technology Upgradation Fund should support automation, digitalisation, advanced technologies, energy efficiency, R&D, and innovation.

Evidence-based policymaking must also be institutionalised. All major trade, tariff, industrial, and investment decisions should undergo comprehensive ex ante economic impact assessments covering competitiveness, employment, exports, investment, fiscal revenues, regional development, and international obligations. Systematic ex post evaluations should subsequently assess effectiveness, identify unintended consequences, and facilitate timely policy adjustments.

Implementation should be monitored through industrial output, productivity, export diversification, employment, investment, technological upgrading, and effective rates of protection. Regular reviews, data analytics, and institutional accountability should ensure continuous improvement and responsiveness to changing conditions.

Pakistan’s long-term challenge is not simply to formulate better individual policies but to establish a governance framework in which industrial, trade, tariff, investment, and export policies operate in harmony. Successful industrial economies demonstrate that sustained competitiveness depends upon policy coherence, institutional coordination, and long-term strategic consistency.

For Pakistan, adopting and effectively implementing a comprehensive National Industrial Policy is no longer optional; it is indispensable to strengthening manufacturing, attracting investment, diversifying exports, generating productive employment, and achieving durable, productivity-led growth.

Read More