Cover Story
Million-dollar Question
The very institution decried for our country’s political ills will have to cajole and coerce the politicians to do what is necessary.
The elusive General Elections 2024 have, at last, been held. In spite of all efforts by the powers that be, it seems their efforts have not succeeded, as despite Imran Khan’s incarceration and attempt to keep the PTI out of the electoral race, the party has managed to show its resilience by remaining prominent and capturing sizable votes.
However, the picture presented in the post-election scenario is most disturbing, considering the poor state of Pakistan’s economy and its reducing clout in world affairs. The National Assembly that will eventually be called, regardless of who holds the position of Prime Minister, will remain a disparate group and will be virtually of the same shape as it was when the no-confidence motion was passed in April 2022, with the PDM, consisting of the PML (N), PPP, MQM and the JUI (F) on the treasury side and PTI choosing not to sit in the Opposition. Only if the PTI had decided to sit on the opposition benches would the General Elections 2024 have been much more productive.
Besides, ironically, the only reason the PTI did not sit on the opposition benches was because it wanted to settle scores with the Establishment for maneuvering to remove the PTI. But the fact that we are in the same position after the elections after one and a half years shows that the Establishment is still in the driving seat and will play a significant role in any future political setup.
This is because the elections are likely to throw up a government whenever it is formed, which, though claiming legitimacy, will consist of parties, none of which will command a simple majority to enable them to form a government on their own. Consequently, we have been set up for a hybrid regime where the Establishment will play a pivotal role. Nevertheless, it is a matter of satisfaction that the Establishment has refrained from interfering directly, as in earlier days when the politicians brought in the non-elected forces because of their contumacy.
Considering that in the changed scenario in the South Asian region, the growing strength of India and weakening of Pakistan’s economy has made it incumbent for us to rethink our relationship with India, the continued influence of the Establishment and a weak federal government being ushered in will not permit the evolution of a government where the Establishment could take a back seat and reconcile to its budget being slashed, thereby resulting in our resources being employed for improving living standards of our people rather than concentrate on preserving our security even when we are all aware that India in its present position will never be inclined to pose any direct threat to Pakistan. This is so because India’s continued confrontation with Pakistan will now be seen as a contest between David and Goliath rather than between two equals, tarnishing its image as a major power India is presently keen on cultivating.
Under the given circumstances, this was perhaps the best time for Pakistan to break out of the hybrid regime that has enveloped us for the last thirty years. Ironically, history is a witness to the fact that political misfortunes of a people tend to lead to the betterment of a country by the adverse circumstances themselves, undoing the misfortune and opening new ways of progress.
In this connection, a parallel can be drawn between Pakistan of 2024 and Turkiye of 2003, when Recep Tayyip Erdoğan became the Turkish President when the country’s economy was struck by runaway inflation when a cup of coffee would cost three thousand liars. Hitherto, Turkey had been governed very much like Pakistan, where in the aftermath of Mustafa Kamal Ata Turk’s revolution, the country was run by the Army with a tight fist to the extent that in 1960, Adnan Menderes, the then Prime Minister of Turkey, was toppled and executed.
However, Erdoğan, by the time he was elected for the third time in 2011, had made effective and far-reaching improvements in the economy and also took steps towards fulfilling the long-standing desire of the majority of Turkish people to be allowed to assert their Muslim heritage hitherto banned by Ata Turk revolution. Erdoğan thus brought in cultural changes in the country by permitting the use of symbols of Muslim culture, such as wearing of hijab and the like. Moreover, he aligned himself with groups who were wary of the Army and was thus able to obliterate its influence in 2016. Thus, misfortune in the shape of runaway inflation allowed Erdoğan to remove the umbrella of the Army.
The question is: Can a similar spate of misfortune of ours at the present juncture lead to such a result where the Establishment’s influence and interference in the governance can be reduced and the federal government can concentrate on developing the economy by taking bold decisions, such as privatization of State Owned Establishments (SOE) such as Pakistan Steel, PIA, etc., along with opening of trade with India and the tourism Industry, which will bring windfall dividends for the country and lead to lowering the hostility between India and Pakistan without backing down diplomatically on our stance on Kashmir.
Considering that none of the political parties command a simple majority in the Parliament to enable them to form a government, this could be done only if the political parties in the assembly in the wake of recent elections show some magnanimity and put away their hubris for each other and stop using the social media to incite the youth to rebel against the state institution by indulging in accusations of massive rigging and instead work towards forming the national government with the sole objective of improving our economy and reducing our dependence on foreign loans and reducing the attraction of our younger generation towards moving abroad by providing them job opportunities within the country, and, at the same time, liberalizing the social life, thereby fulfilling the needs for relaxation and entertainment of the younger people who now dominate our demographic profile.
But the million-dollar question is how will it be done. Ironically, the very institution decried for our country’s political ills will have to interfere to achieve it by cajoling and coercing politicians to do what is necessary. Ours is a great country replete with resources and talent and has the advantage of knowing the English language, thus having a window towards the world, which is an advantage very few countries, barring India, have. Needless to say, India has made full use of its advantage.
The need, therefore, is for rethinking our priorities. Earlier, the religious elements had been a stumbling block in our progress. Still, it is heartening to see that such elements have lost their importance, perhaps because younger Pakistanis are getting the opportunity to travel and live abroad. It is not a mere coincidence that General Elections 2024 have, for the first time, resulted in religious parties being practically wiped out.
This is a good beginning, and the opportunity offered because of the entire country itching for a change must not be wasted. And our politicians and the Establishment should rise to the occasion and rid our nation of poverty, misery, and degradation, which we certainly do not deserve.
The writer is a former judge of the Sindh High Court. He has been actively involved in human and women’s rights causes.
Nestlé Pakistan kicks off urban forest tree plantation
Indian Broadcaster Ameen Sayani died
Insights from Telenor Asia’s Digital Lives Decoded Study
NAPA pays tribute to Talat Hussain
Urdu Columnist Nazir Naji passes away
Cargill meets WHO’s recommended best practices
Oppenheimer leads early wins at BAFTA
China expands influence in Afghanistan
Bangladeshi Nobel winner convicted of violating labour laws
US stalls delivery of drones to India
Accolade for Adib Rizvi
Magazine contests Indian government order
Simi Kamal appointed Chair of the Board of IWMI
US wants Pakistan to probe election irregularities
King Charles marks first outing since cancer diagnosis
Leave a Reply