Going Nowhere
Tamils have lived in India for decades but now they have been
made non-citizens in a land which they considered their own.

Around 100,000 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees have been excluded from the Citizen Amendment Act (CAA) 2019. The law, what some call discriminatory, has triggered a torrent of criticism.
It is not only considered biased towards Muslims but it has also ignored the plight of thousands of Sri Lankan refugees living in Tamil Nadu’s camps or outside the camps. These Lankan refugees have been part of India for the last three generations. These 100,000 immigrants, most of whom are Hindus of Sri Lankan origin, have been leading miserable lives.
There are about 460,000 repatriations on record from Sri Lanka to India, out of which 20 percent claimed Indian citizenship on the basis of their Sri Lankan birth certificates in order to seek asylum in India. These people are marked as Indian Tamils on their birth certificates as their grandparents belonged to India and they were moved to Sri Lanka by the British colonial administration where they were forced to work in tea plantation. These people had no citizenship of either country so they were given a chance to acquire the one under an agreement signed in 1964 between the then prime minister of India Laal Bahadur Shastri and his Sri Lankan counterpart Shri Mavo Bandarnikay.
When the agreement was signed, around 975,000 people of Indian origin were living in Sri Lanka. After 1983 India refused to offer citizenship to Sri Lankan Tamils, arguing that they were not Indians. New Delhi asserted that these were the Tamils of Sri Lankan origin who fled the Island state to save their lives after the violent turn followed by a series of anti-Tamil riots. Indian media also supported the position of their government claiming these refugees have no right to get Indian nationality as they were not the sons of the soil.
Contrary to the claims of the Indian government, these 60,000 people in 107 camps of Tamil Nadu assert that they are of Indian origin and have been demanding Indian nationality. The controversial new Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019 is widely considered to be pro-Hindu and pro other non-Muslim minorities. But it seems it is of no use to the Tamils, most of whom are Hindus. The fate of the Tamils is more uncertain than the Biharis of Bangladesh who were at least offered Bangladeshi nationality. Many of the Biharis also accepted it but the Tamils face a great dilemma. They cannot return to the island state fearing persecution from Sinhala Buddhists who abominate them for being allegedly allies of the Tamil Tigers in the past.
The Sri Lankan government is also skeptical about their loyalty to the Buddhist-dominated state. This leaves them with no option but to start their lives from scratch. Meanwhile, even after spending several decades in India, there is no process or amendment in the Indian constitution that grants them citizenship. This unfortunately strips away the basic human rights of these individuals. They cannot travel abroad, are deprived of government jobs and have a strong sense of alienation in Indian society because they are disfranchised, having no say in the Indian democratic system.
What is surprising is that they cannot even get a house on rent in town and are confined to camps only. This diminishes their chances of climbing the social ladder and they are condemned to be at the bottom layer of social stratification. A number of Tamil students of Sri Lankan origin are excellent in their studies but they are not allowed to travel even if they are offered scholarship by prestigious universities from across the world. Recently some prominent personalities raised this issue of citizenship. Renowned spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravishanker took to twitter to talk about the issue, saying he made many efforts to highlight the issue of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees. He cited his meeting with former Indian president Dr. Abul Kalam where he raised this issue besides presenting a petition signed by 10 million people to ex-Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. He questioned the rationality of denying nationality to these hapless people who acquired this in Canada, Europe and other countries.
The US panel has also slammed the bill by saying that, any religious test undermines democracy. The bill is even against India’s own constitution because being a democratic and secular country any law that reflects religious bias cannot be part of any act or constitution. While the CAA protects and welcomes persecuted Hindu, Parsi, Jain, and Christian communities from neighboring countries, it does not extend the same treatment to Muslims.
Defending his government's position, Home Minister Amit Anilchandra Shah recently told media that Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Pakistan are Muslims majority countries, asserting there cannot be any question of persecution of Muslims in those states. What he forgot to mention is the sectarianism in Muslim countries and that some Muslim minority sects are facing persecution from majority sects.
Apart from that, 90,000 people were not registered even after providing their documents, including former Indian president Fakharudine Ali Ahmed’s family. These people have been living in the largest democracy since 1986. Amit Shah once described these refugees as termites for India. The Citizen Amendment Act excludes 100,000 Tamil Sri Lankans who had been part of India for about 35 years, where, according to Aljazeera, 25,000 children were also born in these camps. These camps were a temporary solution for refugees because they were meant to be sent them back to Sri Lanka after the restoration of peace that was disrupted by the civil war which lasted for years, ending in 2009.![]()
The writer is a free-lance contributor and |
|
Cover Story
|
|
Virus
|
|
Forum
|
|
News Buzz
|
Update |


Leave a Reply