Feature 
 

Banking & Finance

Conventional Banking, Arabic Names

When Muslim countries entered the modern banking era in the 20th century, they faced two choices: develop a new economic theory grounded in the maqasid—the objectives of the Shariah—or certify Western financial instruments through inherited fatwas. Muslims chose the second path.

By Pervez Said | November 2026

For 1,000 years, people preserved the core texts of Islamic law through memory and manuscripts. For 300 years, Europe preserved its core texts by the printing press. That single technological difference helps explain why we still debate 8th-century rulings in 21st-century banking.

The Database Was Ready in 303 AH

Between 148 AH and 303 AH, scholars completed the foundational “database” of Islamic law.

Al-Muwatta by Imam Malik, 179 AH. Sahih Bukhari, 256 AH. Sahih Muslim, 261 AH. Musnad Ahmad, 241 AH. Sunan Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nasai, Ibn Majah and Darimi, all by 303 AH.

Alongside them, the 5 Imams gave us usul al-fiqh, the methodology of law. Later, Ibn Khaldun (732-808 AH) gave us the sociology of wealth in Al-Muqaddimah (779 AH).

The principles were already clear: no zulm, no exploitation, wealth must circulate, no guaranteed return without risk. This was the “economic operating system” of the Muslim world. It was a system designed for trade, partnerships, and productive civilization.

The problem was never the content. The problem was how it traveled.

Then Came a 1000-Year Distribution Problem

Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press in 844 AH / 1440 CE. Within 15 years, the Bible was mass-printed and circulated across Europe. By 1190 AH / 1776 CE, Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations had gone through multiple editions, translated, debated, and taught in universities.

The Muslim world received permission for an Arabic press only in 1141 AH / 1728 CE, and with a condition: no Qur’an, no Hadith, no Fiqh. That ban lasted until 1242 AH / 1826 CE.

As a result, the 9 books of Hadith were not mass-printed until 1277-1315 AH / 1860-1897 CE in Cairo and Hyderabad.

Think about that gap. Imam Bukhari died in 256 AH. His book reached the masses 1,037 years later.

In that same window, Europe printed law codes, commercial contracts, double-entry ledgers, central bank charters, insurance law, and economic theory. It built the infrastructure of modern finance while we were still copying manuscripts by hand.

This was not about intelligence or piety. It was about distribution technology.

The Oral Advantage Became the Distribution Curse. For centuries, Hadith spread by isnad + memorization + handwritten copies. This created extraordinarily strong textual preservation. And it did.

But that story is incomplete.

Oral transmission has built-in noise. The transmitter’s memory, bias, tone, politics, and understanding all affect the message. For 1000 years, there was no widely available “master copy” to audit against.

Classical scholars knew this. They built the science of ilm al-rijal to grade narrators and cross-verify chains. Imam Bukhari famously rejected 600,000 narrations, keeping 7,400. The system was brilliant for its time.

But the real damage was not corruption of words. It was corruption of access.

Before 1277 AH, a qadi in Lahore could only rule based on the manuscripts his library owned. A mufti in Cairo could not easily compare all 9 books side by side. A trader in Istanbul could not read the same commercial rulings as a scholar in Cordoba. This created regional Fiqh silos and guild knowledge.

After 1293 AH, when Bukhari was finally mass-printed, differences became visible, and debates became sharper. But by then Europe had already enjoyed 300 years of printed law, commerce, and economics.

We perfected the database. We failed at distribution. And in umran—Ibn Khaldun’s term for productive civilization —distribution is everything. Ideas that cannot circulate cannot govern economies.


The Consequence: We Imported Instruments, Not Principles.

When Muslim countries entered modern banking in the 20th century, we faced two choices.

Option one: Build new economic theory from our maqasid — the objectives of Shariah.

Option two: Certify Western instruments with old fatwas.

We chose option two.

So today we have murabahah that looks like a loan with a mark-up. Ijara that looks like a lease with a purchase option. Sukuk that look like bonds with an asset wrapper. We took Adam Smith’s science and tried to dress it in 150 AH Fiqh contracts.

The result is what we see: products that are Shariah-compliant on paper but still carry the same debt-based, guaranteed-return DNA that Ibn Khaldun warned leads to civilizational decline.

We did not reinvent the economy. We Islamized the form while importing the substance.

The Two Mistakes
The first mistake: we ignored the 300 years of financial development.

Interest rates, risk pricing, credit markets, limited liability, venture capital these were not “un-Islamic” inventions. They were solutions to the problem of scale. How do you pool capital? How do you price risk? How do you enable strangers to trust each other across continents?

We never built an alternative macro framework. So, when the global system arrived, we had no competing model ready. We defaulted to adoption.
The second mistake: we tried to turn the clock back.

Instead of asking “What is the 1447 AH version of qirad for a fintech startup?” we asked, “How do we make this conventional loan halal?”
Instead of asking “How do we structure equity for SMEs in a digital economy?” we asked, “Can we add an asset to this bond?”

That is theology without science. And as Ibn Khaldun taught us, when law is disconnected from the realities of umran — the actual conditions of production, trade, and technology — both law and civilization suffer. Law becomes ritual, and the economy drifts elsewhere.

What Ibn Khaldun Would Do in 2026

Ibn Khaldun did not issue fatwas on riba. The 5 Imams had already done that. His job was to explain why economies grow or collapse.

His answer was simple: growth comes from labor, risk, and production.

If he were writing today, he would start with data.

How does debt vs. equity affect SME growth in Pakistan, Turkey, and Indonesia?

Does a guaranteed return create zulm when risk is asymmetric?

Can we price risk and liquidity without institutionalizing riba?

What does wealth circulation look like in a digital, tokenized economy?

That is the task now. Not to abandon the maqasid. But to translate them.

Maqasid are policy objectives, not product manuals.

No zulm can be measured by bankruptcy rates and predatory lending.

Circulation can be measured by velocity of money and SME access to capital.

Risk-sharing can be measured by equity participation and loss absorption.

Science tells us “How.” Maqasid tells us “For what.” We need both.

Conclusion: We Need New Usul, Not Just New Products
The printing press gave Europe a 300-year first-mover advantage. We cannot get those years back. But we can stop pretending that 150 AH contracts are the only way to implement 150 AH principles.

The Muslim world needs an Ibn Khaldun for the 21st century. Someone who takes modern economic science seriously, and then filters it through the immutable principles of justice, circulation, and shared risk.

That means building new usul — new methodologies — for digital finance, for equity crowdfunding, for risk-sharing platforms, for central bank policy. It means moving from product certification to system design.

Until we do that, Islamic finance will remain what it is today: conventional banking with Arabic names.

And that is not a failure of Islam. It is a failure to do the work Ibn Khaldun did, to connect eternal principles to the economics of our time.

Read More

Pervez Said

The writer, an MBA from Ohio University with more than 30 years of experience in banking, is a pioneer of Islamic banking in Pakistan. He contributed to the development of the country’s regulatory framework at the State Bank of Pakistan, served on the SBP’s Shariah Board, introduced numerous Islamic products at Citibank, Standard Chartered Bank, and Mashreq Bank, and served as CEO of Burj Islamic Bank.

Leave a Reply

Update