Colombo
Bitter Brew
The ongoing war between Iran and the U.S. has plunged Sri Lanka’s tea industry into a deepening crisis, threatening the livelihoods of roughly 10 per cent of the island nation’s population

Sri Lanka’s tea industry is facing a growing crisis as the war involving Iran, the United States and Israel disrupts shipping routes, increases export costs and threatens the livelihoods of millions of people. What may seem like a distant geopolitical conflict has become a direct economic concern for the island nation, where tea is not merely a traditional beverage but also a major source of foreign exchange, employment and rural income.
According to an EconomyNext report published on 18 March 2026, Sri Lanka’s tea industry, valued at approximately US$1.5 billion, was experiencing severe logistical disruption, with exporters reporting that finished products were accumulating in warehouses because they could not be shipped. The crisis exposes the vulnerability of export-dependent economies to geopolitical instability and raises an important question: how can Sri Lanka protect its workers and businesses when international conflict threatens the foundations of its economy?
Sri Lanka is one of the world’s leading tea exporters, and Ceylon Tea enjoys an established international reputation. However, a substantial share of its exports has traditionally gone to the Middle East and North Africa, as well as to markets in Russia, the Commonwealth of Independent States, Europe and East Asia. According to industry representatives cited by EconomyNext, disruption across the Middle East and North Africa could affect 60–70 per cent of total tea exports, although this estimate describes potential exposure rather than confirmed losses of that magnitude.
The conflict has affected both the destinations for Sri Lankan tea and the routes used to reach international buyers. Disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, combined with difficulties at major transit hubs such as Dubai and Doha, have complicated established shipping arrangements. Vessels rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope face longer journeys, higher fuel consumption and delayed deliveries. The consequences extend beyond transportation. Exporters must contend with higher insurance premiums, emergency shipping surcharges and uncertainty over whether buyers will receive their orders. In some cases, war-risk insurance premiums have risen dramatically, while additional charges imposed by shipping companies are increasing the cost of transporting containers. These expenses threaten to make Sri Lankan tea less competitive in international markets.
The problem is particularly severe when exporters have already purchased, processed, and packaged tea but cannot deliver it. Warehouses fill up, working capital becomes tied up in unsold inventory, payments are delayed, and businesses face pressure to cut purchasing costs. Eventually, that pressure can travel backwards through the supply chain, affecting farmers and plantation workers. The economic consequences are not confined to exporters or financial markets. Sri Lanka’s tea industry supports approximately 2.4 million people, while nearly half of its Ceylon Tea exports, worth around US$680 million annually, have traditionally gone to Middle Eastern markets. These figures illustrate the industry’s scale, although the number of people supported includes livelihoods beyond direct plantation employment. For plantation workers and smallholder farmers, declining prices and uncertain demand can threaten already limited household budgets. Workers may earn less or face fewer employment opportunities, while smallholders may struggle to cover fertiliser, transport and other production costs. Families already facing rising food and energy prices have even less capacity to absorb these shocks.
The crisis has also highlighted the pressures facing plantation households, with reports of families switching from cooking gas to firewood as energy costs rise. Concerns have also been raised about food insecurity, school absenteeism and workers leaving plantations in search of better opportunities. These pressures are particularly troubling because plantation communities already face longstanding challenges involving wages, living conditions and access to economic opportunities. The conflict has not created every underlying problem; rather, it has intensified existing inequalities and left vulnerable households less able to withstand another economic shock.
Sri Lanka’s economic relationship with Iran adds another dimension to the crisis. In 2021, the two countries agreed on a tea-for-oil arrangement under which Sri Lankan tea exports would help settle outstanding payments owed for crude oil imports. The mechanism helped Sri Lanka address a substantial debt to Iran while maintaining a channel for tea exports despite restrictions affecting conventional dollar-based transactions. However, the arrangement has faced significant complications.
The immediate priority should be to protect livelihoods and maintain the industry’s ability to operate. The government could introduce targeted, temporary assistance for vulnerable plantation households, facilitate working-capital loans for viable exporters and smallholders, and coordinate with shipping companies to secure alternative transport arrangements. Any public support for freight or insurance costs should be carefully targeted, transparent, and financially sustainable. At the same time, Sri Lanka must accelerate the diversification of its export markets. Strengthening commercial relationships in East Asia, Europe, North America and other potential destinations could reduce its dependence on any single region. However, diversification requires more than identifying new customers. Exporters need reliable shipping, competitive prices, effective distribution networks and payment mechanisms that continue to function during international crises.
Investment in value-added products offers another opportunity. Branded tea packets, speciality blends, tea bags and premium gift products can help Sri Lanka capture more value from its internationally recognised product. Expanding these efforts could improve profit margins and reduce reliance on bulk exports. Yet product diversification must complement, rather than replace, improvements in logistics and market access. Economic resilience must also include stronger social protection for plantation communities. Better access to essential services, vocational training and alternative rural employment would help households withstand future disruptions. The government should monitor tea auction prices, export volumes, freight costs, employment and household incomes to identify emerging risks before they develop into a broader social crisis.
Sri Lanka’s tea crisis illustrates how geopolitical conflict can transmit economic shocks across borders, turning shipping disruptions into lost income, rising living costs and greater insecurity for ordinary families. The country cannot control the course of the conflict involving Iran, but it can strengthen its capacity to withstand its consequences. Emergency assistance is necessary to protect vulnerable households, while market diversification, value-added production, energy security and improved social protection are essential to long-term resilience. Ultimately, the future of Ceylon Tea should not be measured solely by export earnings or auction prices. It must also be measured by whether the farmers who cultivate it and the workers who harvest it can maintain secure livelihoods when the international environment becomes unpredictable. Protecting Sri Lanka’s tea industry is therefore not simply about safeguarding a major export; it is about protecting the people whose lives depend on it.
The writer, based in Islamabad, holds a Master’s degree in Defence and Strategic Studies. He can be contacted at daniyaltalat2013@gmail.com.


Leave a Reply