Left in the Lurch
The act of a few destructive Muslim elements in the Easter Sunday attacks has put the entire Muslim population at risk though they are as law-abiding citizens as the rest of the Sri Lankans.
"Everything changed after the Easter Sunday attacks. Instantly, the entire Muslim community was dubbed as terrorists and extremists. Random arrests, abusive remarks, unnecessary raids and unjust detentions became common for individuals who believed in Islam or had a Muslim name. My mother-in-law and sister-in-law who had always observed niqab when going out were compelled to remove it. I, being a hijabi travel blogger, became hesitant and sceptical about going to areas with non-Muslim majority.”
Aaliyah, resident of Kalutara, Sri Lanka.
On 21st April 2019, Easter Sunday, churches and hotels in Colombo and two other cities in Sri Lanka were attacked with bombs by a local Muslim armed group, claiming 250 lives and injuring hundreds more. For the following four months, a state of emergency was imposed by the Sri Lankan government.
Numerous Muslims were taken into custody without charge under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. Properties of Muslims, including mosques, schools and businesses, were attacked by anti-Muslim mobs which were known to be incited by extremist Buddhist monks, with every Muslim made to feel responsible for the attacks.
This new wave of hate did not even spare Muslim doctors and other professionals, with one physician arrested and accused of sterilizing Sinhala women. Not only this, a gang of unelected extremist monks coerced the mass demission of Muslim State and Deputy Ministers. Muslim women were the ones who suffered the most.
Since the government of Sri Lanka announced a complete ban on all types of face covers after the attacks in order to help security forces with the investigations as well as to crush the growing wariness among the multi-ethnic communities, niqab-wearing women had to put up with this spiteful situation.
“After the ban, one of my sisters-in-law, who teaches in a madrassa, faced a lot of unpleasant situations. She, along with other teachers, was demanded to get all her teaching material checked by law enforcement personnel. Also, the teachers had to make a new ID card to prove that the madrassa is registered,” says Aaliyah. “Since I do not observe niqab, I had to help my other sister-in-law with the outdoor chores, who chose to be confined to her home, instead of going out without niqab. But, now that the ban has been lifted, the situation is not as bad as it was before. The niqab-wearing women, however, still have to uncover their faces at places like airports, polling stations and other security checks. So, life for them may never be the same again.”
During the Presidential Elections in November 2019, Saman Sri Rathnayake, commissioner general of the Sri Lanka Elections Secretariat, ascertained that there was no ban on veils/niqab but veiled women were requested to show their faces at polling stations as a formality to ensure that the holder of the identity card was the same person who was casting the vote.
Before the Easter Sunday attacks, the Muslim community that makes up almost 10% of Sri Lanka’s population, did not have a history of violent extremism in the country, although they did face some pressure and persecution in the Buddhist majority areas in recent years.
The tension between the Muslim minority and Buddhist majority had long been simmering under the surface, but after this unfortunate incident, the hate and discrimination has spiked to a new level. Even though the state of emergency that was imposed after the bombings was lifted in August, uncertainties can still be found in the Sri Lankan Muslim community. On the outside they seem relieved and normal after the ban has been lifted, but on the inside, they are still worried and concerned about the future.
There are Muslims in Sri Lanka who speak the majority Sinhala language, but most of them are Tamil. Since the Tamil community includes people belonging to different faiths, after the Easter bombings, the Muslim members of the community had to face discrimination from their fellow community members too. They believe the ban had done more harm than good.
However, they do realise that the attacks were the worst level of violence the country had experienced since its civil war ended a decade ago - a war that was not fought on religious lines but between the Tamil Tigers and the State. The Tamil Tigers were seeking independence for the Tamil nation from Sri Lanka and its Sinhalese majority. Even then, the measures taken by the government after the attacks were not appreciated by the Muslims in Sri Lanka and around the world. They believe the reaction of the government should be to find and prosecute the perpetrators rather than collective punishment of the Muslim community, especially women, as a lot of them were confined to their homes to both practice their faith and observe the ban.
If the Sri Lankan authorities want to avoid such future incidents, they should focus their attention on mending the broken security apparatus of the country rather than alienating the law-abiding Muslim citizens who consider Sri Lanka their home.![]()
The writer is a journalist and sociologist with a passion for fiction writing. She is also a social media blogger covering human rights and mental health issues and can be reached at q.thalho@hotmail.com |
|
Cover Story
|
|
Virus
|
Forum
|
|
News Buzz
|
Leave a Reply Cancel reply |
Update |


Such an informative piece. Thank you SouthAsia mag. Keeping posting such well researched articles.
A bitter reality, Muslims are facing the target of hatred and prejudice all around the world, good Quratulain!