Islamabad
Dangling Republic
Pakistan’s economy seems to be suspended between stabilization and collapse, repeatedly negotiating external assistance while struggling to implement structural reforms at home
Pakistan’s economic trajectory has long resembled a pendulum, swinging between brief spurts of growth and prolonged phases of crisis. Each recovery is often followed by fiscal stress, external borrowing, and renewed stabilization programs. Since 1958, Pakistan has entered more than twenty arrangements with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), reflecting persistent structural weaknesses in the economy. Today, the country is again operating under a $7 billion, 37-month Extended Fund Facility (EFF) agreed with the IMF in 2024. The central question remains: is Pakistan trapped in a cycle of dependency, or can it break the pattern and move towards sustainable stability?
The current IMF program aims to consolidate the fragile stabilization achieved after the 2023 balance-of-payments crisis. The EFF focuses on restoring macroeconomic stability, rebuilding foreign exchange reserves, reducing inflation, and creating conditions for sustainable growth. Its reform agenda includes broadening the tax base, strengthening fiscal discipline, restructuring state-owned enterprises, reforming the energy sector, and improving governance and transparency in public finances.
Fiscal consolidation lies at the core of the program. Pakistan has committed to increasing tax revenues by expanding the tax net, reducing exemptions, and bringing undertaxed sectors such as retail and agriculture into the formal system. At the same time, federal and provincial governments are expected to coordinate through a proposed National Fiscal Pact to strengthen revenue collection and rationalize public spending responsibilities. These reforms are intended to place public finances on a more sustainable footing while safeguarding social protection and development spending.
Despite these efforts, structural vulnerabilities remain. According to recent IMF assessments, Pakistan’s fiscal deficit is projected at around 4.1 percent of GDP for the current fiscal year, an improvement from 5.3 percent last year but still above official targets. Long-term pressures from rising pension and healthcare costs also threaten to widen fiscal gaps unless structural reforms are sustained. Encouragingly, increased tax collection and fiscal consolidation could gradually reduce the country’s public debt ratio from about 71.6 percent of GDP to around 60 percent by the end of the decade, but only if reform momentum is maintained.
However, domestic reforms alone may not determine Pakistan’s economic future. External shocks, particularly those linked to global energy markets and geopolitical conflicts, continue to shape the country’s economic vulnerability. Recent developments in the Middle East illustrate how quickly global instability can spill over into Pakistan’s economy.
The escalating conflict in the Middle East has already begun to affect Pakistan through energy prices and financial markets. In response to rising global oil prices linked to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, the government recently implemented an emergency Rs55-per-litre increase in petrol and diesel prices, highlighting how quickly global shocks translate into domestic economic pressure. Analysts warn that this may only be the first of several adjustments if volatility in oil markets persists.
Pakistan’s economy is particularly sensitive to energy shocks. Past episodes, such as the oil price surges of 2008 and 2022, show that attempts to shield consumers through subsidies often worsen fiscal deficits and fuel inflation once price adjustments eventually occur. In both cases, delayed price corrections contributed to macroeconomic instability and exchange-rate pressures.
The current crisis carries additional risks because Pakistan’s external sector is closely tied to the Middle East. A significant share of remittances comes from Gulf economies, while much of Pakistan’s west-bound exports transit through ports in the region. Any prolonged disruption to shipping routes or economic activity in Gulf states could therefore reduce remittance inflows, disrupt trade, and place further pressure on the exchange rate.
Energy supply risks are another concern. Industry sources warn that diesel imports, crucial for agriculture and transport, could become difficult to secure if disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz persist. With the wheat harvest approaching, diesel shortages could push up food prices and intensify inflationary pressures across the economy.
These external shocks highlight a deeper structural reality as Pakistan’s economic stability remains heavily dependent on factors beyond its control. A narrow export base, heavy reliance on imported energy, and dependence on external financing continue to expose the country to global volatility.
Yet Pakistan’s long-term potential remains considerable. With a population exceeding 240 million, a large youth demographic, and a strategic geographic position linking South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, the country possesses structural advantages that could support sustained growth. Expanding exports, improving industrial productivity, and investing in human capital could gradually reduce vulnerability to external shocks.
Ultimately, Pakistan’s latest IMF program should be viewed not merely as another bailout but as a test of reform credibility. If the commitments embedded in the EFF translate into durable institutional changes, particularly in taxation, fiscal management, and energy governance, the country could gradually escape its recurring cycle of crises.
If not, Pakistan risks remaining what some observers increasingly describe as a “dangling republic”, suspended between stabilization and collapse, repeatedly negotiating external assistance while struggling to implement structural reforms at home.
The choice between these two futures will depend less on external financing and more on domestic resolve. Sustainable recovery will require political consensus, institutional discipline, and a willingness to pursue reforms that extend beyond immediate crisis management. Only then can Pakistan transform its periodic stabilization efforts into a durable foundation for economic resilience.
Based in Islamabad, the writer is a senior research associate at the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI). He can be reached at asifjaved@sdpi.org


Leave a Reply