Singapore, an island country and city-state in maritime Southeast Asia, has selected its new Prime Minister. It took the world’s most progressive country a period of four years to select the best candidate for the prime ministership as the selection procedure was based on a 4-year rigorous and time-consuming performance index review applied to four outstanding candidates. Finally, Mr. Lawrence Wong was chosen to take responsibility as the 4th PM of Singapore because he scored the highest on the job Key Performing Indicators (KPIs) of Performance, Integrity, Character, and Quality. Mr. Wong has a double degree and a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University.
Mr. Lawrence Wong scored ZERO in the following:
1. Public grievances.
2. Traffic Summons for Police.
3. Open Call.
4. Expressions of hate against certain races.
5. Bribery and corruption.
6. Legal cases in court.
7. Tax fraud;
8. Power abuse.
9. Interpol, F.B.I., and C.I.A. inspections.
Instead of flogging the dead horse of democracy, can’t we use the same procedure to select the best candidate for the top post of PM based on his leadership competency rather than anything else?
Leave a Reply