Quest for Equilibrium
A peace accord has been reached between the Taliban and the United States after 19 years of futile war. This requires neighbouring Pakistan to realign its policies in the region and participate actively in Afghanistan’s reconstruction.

The global system today must be examined in at least three differing and yet inter-related realms: sub-regional, regional and global. From a policymaking perspective, the navigation of these interconnected realms is a task of such herculean complexity that the adoption of sub-optimal policy choices becomes the norm more often than not.
In Pakistan’s case, its geopolitical contextual specifics are underpinned with variables that only add to its feelings of profound existential angst. Its security managers have a multitude of factors to consider when it comes to sustainably formulating and implementing optimal policy options so that some of this existential angst can be mitigated or managed. In many instances, not only are Pakistani policymakers hampered with the related issues highlighted here but also with the negativities associated with the intricate links that prevail between external and internal systemic dynamics. In other words, Pakistan’s geopolitical contextual specifics are so profoundly problematic and complex that its security managers often struggle to find an acceptable equilibrium between management and prescriptive approaches. The purpose of this piece is to critically examine how one geopolitical variable, Afghanistan, is affecting the nature and scope of Pakistan’s prescriptive response to its overall security environment.
Afghanistan is a variable that does little to alleviate the feelings of existential angst that permeate the Pakistani policymaking process. Intricately situated points of intersection exist between external and internal dynamics on the one hand and the realms-based perspective to be adopted to underpin the overall basket of Afghan- related policies on the other. How then is Pakistan’s policymaking community to navigate these ensuing fluidic complexities regarding its Afghan conundrum?
The inextricable links that prevail between internal and external variables in this instance ensure that Afghan policy will remain subservient to the concept of optimized equilibrium. Pakistan’s security managers must constantly strive to account for both internal political compulsions (Pashtunistan issue) and South Asian security dynamics while still keeping in mind prevailing linkages between sub-regional and regional (Asiatic) dynamics. The complex interplay between these various realms will continue to add an even greater “haze” to the conceptualization and implementation of Afghan policy which requires constant and consistent calibration on part of Pakistan’s security managers. Alleviating stress in one area of policy will undoubtedly lead to mostly unforeseeable negative consequences in other areas which even the most optimally efficient procedural mechanisms will not be able to mitigate. Afghan policy then is a perfect case in point of the dynamics highlighted earlier i.e. increasing complexity will lead to a greater chance of sub-optimal policy options being adopted.
In terms of internal variables, prevailing historical and cultural ties between Pashtuns on both sides of the Durand Line ensure the prevalence of inextricable links between southern Afghanistan and Pakistan’s northern areas. Consequently, Pakistan has no choice but to adopt a proactive/preemptive approach when it comes to maintaining the stability of its northern areas. In many ways, Pakistan’s so-called “interference” in Afghanistan’s complex internal dynamics is a necessity borne more out of existential angst than any nefarious expansionary designs. The continuing hostility of the Afghan central government (use of the Pahtunistan issue) does little to convince Pakistan’s security managers that a less proactive approach might lead to some mitigation of their genuine concerns.
Pakistan’s so-called “interference” in Afghanistan’s complex internal dynamics is a necessity borne more out of existential angst than any nefarious expansionary designs.
The problem is further compounded by the fact that any fluidic instability in Pakistan’s northern areas could trigger the domino effect where other parts of the state might attempt, perhaps successfully, to cede from the union. Internal variables are clearly playing a pivotal role in shaping, both in terms of conceptualization as well as implementation, Pakistan’s policy approaches towards the mitigation of its Afghan conundrum. Proactive involvement in Afghan internal dynamics is an absolute necessity owing to the dynamics highlighted here but these policies require constant and consistent calibration lest they have a deleterious impact on Pakistan’s holistic security environment. The recent agreement between Washington and the Taliban is a perfect case in point. The success or failure of this agreement will have an indelible impact on Pakistan’s internal security dynamics, not to mention that an unstable/stable Afghanistan will also have an influence on South Asian security dynamics.
The intersection points between South Asian (sub-regional) and Asiatic (regional) security dynamics also play a pivotal role in shaping Pakistan’s policy approaches on Afghanistan. Prevailing systemic dynamics in the sub-regional realm are the primary source of the feelings of existential angst shaping and driving the perceptions of Pakistan’s security managers. The need to maintain systemic bipolarity within the South Asian context is one of the cornerstones of Pakistan’s overall prescriptive approach towards security. Curtailing India’s great power aspirations is pivotal to ensuring the prevalence of this sub-regional systemic bipolarity which, in turn, is crucial when it comes to ensuring Pakistan’s viability as a polity.
In other words, South Asian dynamics are the centerpiece around which Pakistan’s overall prescriptive approach towards security revolves. Afghan policy cannot be seen in isolation from this fact. At the same time, ongoing dynamics at the regional level cannot be ignored either owing to the prevalence of intricate links between it and the sub-regional realms. Consequently, the on-going great power dynamics that prevail between China and the United States are already having an indelible impact on overall Asian security dynamics and hence on sub-regional dynamics as well, South Asia being no exception. As a result, Pakistan’s security managers must attempt to adopt optimized policy options keeping in mind the prevailing links between Asiatic dynamics and Pakistan’s own geopolitical contextual specifics. Afghan policy is, once again, a perfect case in point where policy approaches need to be calibrated keeping overall Asian security dynamics in mind.
The recent agreement between Washington and the Taliban can be seen as a direct consequence of concerns that the former has regarding the systemic emergence of China as a viable peer competitor whereas for Pakistan it is about maintaining the stability of its own western frontier, thereby mitigating a serious source of its feelings of existential angst. A perfect case in point of how the prevalence of links between Asian and South Asian security dynamics has an indelible impact on Pakistan’s overall prescriptive approach towards security.
In short, Asian and South Asian security dynamics are intricately linked to the point where each realm is symbiotically connected to the other. The overall impact on Pakistan’s prevailing security posture is profound, to say the least. Pakistan’s security managers are in a constant struggle to find an equilibrium point between internal and external variables on the one hand and between sub-regional and regional dynamics on the other. The intersection points between the internal/external matrix and the perceptual realms matrix are difficult to clearly discern, let alone efficiently navigate. The Afghan policy is a clear example of how this policymaking conundrum plays itself out when it comes to the conceptualization and implementation of Pakistan’s overall approach towards security. ![]()
 
The writer is a security studies specialist. His primary area of focus is geostrategy/geopolitics with a particular emphasis on systemic dynamics. He has taught at the National Defence University in Islamabad and is currently serving as an assistant professor at the Institute of Business Administration in Karachi. He can be reached at munshibilal@gmail.com  | 
| 
 Cover Story 
 | 
| 
 Virus 
 | 
| 
 Forum 
 | 
| 
 News Buzz 
 | 
Update | 


						
						
						
						
Leave a Reply