Cover Story
Land of the Unchosen Few
Democracy now lies firmly in the grip of those who, by the inconsistencies of destiny, sit in the chair of authority.

‘There will be no end to the troubles of states, or of humanity itself, till philosophers become kings in this world, or till those we now call kings and rulers really and truly become philosophers, and political power and philosophy thus come into the same hands.’ - Plato.
While beginning this piece, I was advised by a friend that under the prevailing circumstances, I should try to be as politically correct as possible. It was what General Douglas MacArthur was told to be by President Truman, in one of their exchanges. When Macarthur asked, what being ‘politically correct’ was, Truman replied, ‘that it was a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end.’
We in Pakistan are finding it more and more difficult to be politically correct since we have now begun to run out of ‘clean ends.’ Having stood witness to the affairs of my country and watched each passing phase of a political evolution unfold before my eyes, I do not know whether to be concerned or amused. The former for the obvious effect this political system may have on the future of our nation and the generations to come - the latter, because I, now having lived long enough, relatively insignificantly, can recognise my irrelevance to the future, yet feel entitled to an unqualified opinion.
I am reminded of the famous Shakespearean quote, ‘the evil that men do lives after them. The good is oft interred with their bones.’ Our graveyards are so replete with the good that people did – foregone conclusions, forgotten and ignored, and yet this nation remains enveloped in the evil so many others have left behind!! So, one wonders, what will this country look like in another generation, but what would we want it to look like, and these are two very different sentiments – the first, a likely outcome of what we do today, and the second, a dream of what it could have been.
Nations have collapsed in the past; history stands witness to such happenings, but if one looks into it searching for a lesson, one will discover that this is a familiar human story. It is the story of a people who believed, for a long time, that their actions did not have consequences. It is the story of how those people will cope with the crumbling of their own myth. It is our story. Sorry and sad.
We have now reached the dizzying heights of disorder and have established the rule of chaos. Democracy and mobocracy are synonymous in our chosen way of life and preferred system. No rational, nor reason, judicial or administrative application, logic or judgement stand as factors in any equation to affect right from wrong, black from white, in this system.
The line dividing propriety from impropriety is no longer visible, nor does it matter anymore. Individual acts are no longer governed by honour, honesty, a sense of doing the right thing, moral persuasion, or human empathy. We roam the streets either like predators or like those who are the hunted. Might is now effectively right – who you are is far more important than the things you do. Merit is sacrificed at the altar of parochialism, nepotism, or cheap popularity, while every office exhibits a totally clueless, incompetent, and unqualified semi-literate idiot who misuses his authority and causes damage to whatever institution he pretends to represent. Justice is dispensed selectively, if time is found for any dispensation at all, in the first place. It is so shamelessly forgiving to the few undeserving criminals and yet so shamefully and disproportionately punitive to those who are probably innocent and are implicated in exaggerated or false cases.
Consistency in governance is measured by the convenience it offers to the administrator; continuity in routine is only specific to the corruption it lives on. An individual’s security now depends on how far and wide one can avoid and distance oneself from the government, law enforcement, and the justice system. Survival in this country has now become an art performed by communities and individuals, despite the government and in spite of the administration.
It is impossible to tell how fast our society is collapsing because history has been riddled with disinformation, and reality is composed of half-fictions and full of paranoid conspiracy theories. Yet, if nothing changes in the way things are being done now, then this envisaged collapse is not only predictable but highly inevitable. The causes of a societal collapse have always been either economic or moral, but in our case, they are both, and together collectively, which makes it even more ominous.
We need a technocratic government at the provincial and national levels.
Aristotle (384BC-322BC) had feared that the inherent dangers in democracy were, first, the conflict between the aristocracy and the poor, and second, it would usher in corruption. Both processes would lead to collapse unless the separation of powers was enforced. We have arrived there already. The swagger of the insignificant crook as his armed guards follow him is all indicative of this reality.
Polybius (200BC -118BC) asserted that all nations follow a cycle: democracy, oligarchy, dictatorship, tyranny, and collapse. We have managed to arrive at the ‘collapse’ without even sampling the other forms of governance. Are we to be denied basic nationhood, and are we then a failed state even before becoming a state?
Closer to our own times, Ibn Khuldun (1332-1406) stated that dynasties (governments) repeatedly become sedentary, senile, coercive, pompous, and subservient to desire. Group feelings disappear as the dynasty (government) grows senile, and senility is a chronic disease for which there is no cure because it is something natural. Has our society become too senile and indifferent to rise above the status quo?
States do die or disappear occasionally, but mostly they outlive the span of human life. There are moral difficulties in indicting a whole nation, because to do so would be to make the passive majority suffer the acts of the criminal minority and future generations for the sins of their fathers. Are we destined to continue living as such – in the wake of the sins of our fathers, while we suffer the consequences of the phenomenon we are mistakenly living in and sanctimoniously classify as ‘democracy’? The question is, are we dying? Probably we are. Corruption has brought about an economic and moral collapse.
A senility has permeated our society as we learn to accept the status quo and not challenge the convention that governs our society. Democracy now lies firmly in the grip of rascals who, by the inconsistencies of destiny, sit in the chair of authority. The power they wield is not a consequence of any qualification, education, awareness, experience, or moral equation but simply the manipulation of state machinery and apparatus. This manipulation has no moral censure, law, rules, or regulations that either control or govern it. The aberration of injustices, maladministration, and poor governance is explained and justified by the jugglery of words in a dishonest rhetoric; opinions shaped through a twisted mass media, spewing dishonesty and deceit.
Democracy has now turned the full circle, a phenomenon recognised by the tyranny of the few that exploits the silent majority. Thus, the democratic process for Pakistan can never be a solution to the problems its society and nation face since the application of democracy as we know it, only empowers criminals, convicts and villains through the low values that have been introduced, new conventions, bad practices and wayward morals that now grip our society.
There is no political solution to Pakistan’s woes - not with these people, not with this leadership, or that which is available in the country.
To oppose such values, one must fall to the level of such standards, and many prefer to hold their peace in silence rather than compromise on their own principles. Thus, the rogues in power walk away uncontested, hooting into the wind while celebrating their conquest, shamelessly holding up their fingers displaying the victory sign.
Having watched the happenings that go around us on a day-to-day basis, I have finally come to the conclusion that there is no political solution to Pakistan’s woes - not with these people, not with this leadership, or that which is available in the country. So many reasons are cited for where we as a nation have descended. Corruption is, first and foremost. In Pakistan, the slogan remains, ‘I pray that I rise to a material level where I too can afford to be honest’ – it’s conditional, relative, and flexible. Corruption is not exclusive to those in power but envelopes anyone who has the opportunity, regardless of their status, from the lowest level of human being to the highest. No transaction, business, or engagement is possible without corruption. It’s the norm.
Even the one offering the sweetener is relieved in that he has discovered a way forward to whatever he wanted done, acquired, or sold. Officials put up their demands and justify their claim on the basis that they are going for the Hajj. We proudly call ourselves the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, where every mosque is filled with humanity, yet no child is safe on the streets.
Ours is a nation destined to be rated as 130th out of 139 countries in the rule of law, one of the most corrupt countries in the world (140th in ranking out of 180), a bankrupt state living off the largesse of others, and on the edge of being declared a failed state. Our political acumen is measured by the loans we can acquire as we stand before the world hat in hand, begging, suppliant, and pleading. Our people are an accomplice to this phenomenon of shameless conduct as we keep bleating about the joys of democracy and sell our vote to the highest bidder.
A society of hypocrites, whose religion evolves around form while substance is quietly set aside; a people stooped in ritual as they forget God in their enthusiasm to practice and warped belief. We have allowed the benefits of Islam, as a way of life, to be adopted and enjoyed by countries that may have no Muslims. Yet, we who are Muslims, living in an Islamic republic, have ignored the basic principle of ‘Haqquq al Abad’ as we steal, lie, and cheat each other.
Can democracy be the answer to this aberration of a country where both people and government are accomplices in misrule and maladministration, each living off the other? Can anyone be so naïve as to expect that ‘of the people, by the people, for the people‘ is the panacea for the ills we suffer? That we need to continue to follow the course, and in time, we shall finally get it right? To me, such people live in a fool’s paradise – they cannot see the irreversible damage being done by the games we play; we are running out of resources and time. Each day of democracy in Pakistan has proven to be worse than the one before it – nothing improves in this system as each day brings us closer to our own demise.
So I ask myself as to what is the purpose of this write-up? Is it just the rants of a frustrated person who has found a method to unburden himself? These lines are not likely to influence, affect, or impress anyone at all; the thought within them will matter even less. I write in disgust and contempt, more with myself than anything else. I am now living that hopeless feeling of failure reinforced by the inability to do anything, being another helpless, irrelevant citizen surrounded by a society drowning in fatalism, who remains resigned to whatever destiny metes out to them. The offices that matter neither have the intellect to comprehend the gravity of the situation nor the moral courage to do anything about it. They live on in the hope that things will right themselves. Others are simply beneficiaries of this flawed system; until it collapses, they have much to gain from it.
However, when it finally implodes, these leaders and the privileged few will flee from this country like rats abandoning a sinking ship. There is no example of any country in a predicament like ours that pulled itself out of its misery through a democratic exercise. In our own region, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia are some good examples of nations that have risen from the ashes to take their place amongst the comity of nations, and their administrative models or types of governance forms could be studied.
Then again, even in the West, states in crisis adopted measures such as Technocrat Governments or National Governments to bring order to disorder, and these states included Greece, Italy, and France, amongst many others. Never before has a nation needed to do something unconventional, different, and quickly to confront the future and sustain itself, as Pakistan needs to do now. We need a change. The change could be anything, but it must be able to bring about a difference quickly and permanently.
We need a technocratic government at the provincial level as well as the national level. Small cabinets of a dozen experts at the national level and half a dozen at the provincial level. A judicial team with military vigilance should select them. They must be mandated to address the three crucial four areas immediately, i.e., the economy (including documenting the informal economy), the foreign policy direction and priorities, and National Security. The government must be installed for at least 5 to 7 years and tasked to carry out the reforms that the country needs desperately. These reforms must include:
· Judicial reforms.
· De-politicisation of the police.
· Rewriting or moderating part of the Constitution.
· Developing more provinces.
· Education based on internationally recognised standards.
· Merit orientation in the bureaucracy and civil services.
· Privatising government-owned businesses immediately.
· Madrassa reforms and reigning in the influence of the maulvi or of religion in politics.
· Industrial reforms to boost manufacturing and production.
· Bringing services into the private sector to include energy distribution, type of energy, consumer services, and establishing national consumer standards.
· Defining red lines for waste disposal, energy distribution, water management, enforcing regulations, and implementing rules.
I strongly recommend that, having been able to bind the country within regulatory parameters, standards, and sustainable growth, the technocrat government can ease the way for a more people-inclusive democratic process. This could be the parliamentary system for which, apparently, we are not suited, or a presidential form of government, if that is the preferred choice. Whatever may be needed at that time. I end this note here. I do not know if it has any significance for anyone, if it will influence thinking, and if it can contribute towards a new mechanism to improve our country, but I hope that it is, at least, considered towards such ends.
To conclude, it would not be amiss to quote from the Serenity Prayer:
‘O Lord! Give me the serenity to recognise the things I cannot change,
The courage to change the things I can
And the wisdom to know the difference between both.’![]()
The writer is a retired army officer who has served as the head of Pakistan’s Central Command.


Leave a Reply