Cover Story

More Than A Footnote

After the four-day war between Pakistan and India, the emerging diplomatic mosaic reveals an evolving global order that is multipolar, dialogue-driven, and deeply skeptical of adventurism.

By Prof. Zamir Ahmed Awan | July 2025

The recent escalation between India and Pakistan, culminating in what many call a major regional crisis, has emerged as a pivotal moment in South Asian history. But rather than spiraling into a prolonged conflict or nuclear catastrophe, this chapter has revealed a new regional dynamic marked by Pakistan’s maturity, resilience, and strategic depth. Beyond the battlefield, Pakistan’s diplomatic finesse and political poise have gained global recognition. This moment must now serve as a turning point—not just in the trajectory of Pakistan-India relations, but in the collective journey of this region toward lasting peace, justice, and shared prosperity.

The recent India-Pakistan conflict will be remembered for its military engagements and profound strategic implications. Despite provocative actions by India, including false flag operations and cross-border violations, Pakistan exercised remarkable restraint. Its leadership responded not with reckless retaliation but with calculated firmness, showcasing military readiness and diplomatic responsibility. The fact that the situation did not escalate into a nuclear exchange is a testament to Pakistan’s mature statecraft.

This restraint, however, should not be misunderstood as weakness. On the contrary, it underlined confidence grounded in military preparedness and international support. Pakistan’s armed forces demonstrated superior tactical planning and rapid response capabilities, establishing credibility in deterrence. When challenged, Pakistan acted decisively—but always within the bounds of international law and proportionality.

What truly set Pakistan apart during this crisis was its diplomatic performance. While India’s aggressive posture isolated it from many of its traditional allies, Pakistan’s reasoned, humane, and composed outreach to the international community earned admiration and trust. Pakistan’s diplomatic channels were active, agile, and effective from Beijing to Ankara, from Moscow to the Gulf states. Even in Western capitals, where Islamabad has often struggled to be heard, a fresh narrative highlighted Pakistan as a stabilizing force, not a spoiler.

This diplomatic victory was not spontaneous. It stemmed from years of quiet engagement, people-to-people dialogue, and multilateral cooperation. Pakistan’s growing participation in forums like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), its expanding role in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and its closer alignment with the Global South had already positioned it as a responsible regional actor. The 2025 crisis merely allowed the world to see what Pakistan had been working towards: a foreign policy grounded in peace, regional integration, and mutual respect.

While diplomacy stole the limelight, Pakistan’s military response was equally decisive. In just days, Pakistan neutralized key threats, defended its airspace, and preempted further escalation. With precision and professionalism, the armed forces sent a clear signal: Pakistan’s defenses are strong, its resolve unwavering, and its doctrine credible. The conventional superiority India had long assumed over Pakistan was challenged and neutralized. The concept of strategic parity has now been visibly reinforced.

Moreover, Pakistan’s military leadership worked hand-in-hand with civilian authorities, ensuring transparency and public confidence. The armed forces refrained from excessive rhetoric, allowing actions and outcomes to speak. That discipline and coordination speak volumes about the institution’s professionalism and strategic clarity.

Towards a New Regional Order
The international response to the conflict underscored a shift in global geopolitics. The world is no longer willing to accept unilateral aggression or be swayed by biased narratives. The post-colonial Global South has grown increasingly assertive about fairness, justice, and sovereignty. In this environment, Pakistan’s stand resonated deeply.

China played a key stabilizing role. Russia echoed similar sentiments, advocating restraint and negotiation. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) strongly backed Pakistan’s position, while the United Nations called for dialogue and de-escalation. Even the United States, traditionally closer to India, acknowledged Pakistan’s role in averting a broader catastrophe.

This diplomatic mosaic reveals a multipolar, dialogue-driven, evolving global order and is deeply skeptical of adventurism. Pakistan stands well-positioned in this new paradigm.

While this chapter may be a diplomatic and strategic success for Pakistan, the goal remains peace, not conflict. However, the recent episode should now inspire a regional awakening.

India must rethink its trajectory. Its militarized nationalism and hegemonic ambitions are destabilizing and self-defeating. Peace with Pakistan is not a favor to Islamabad but is necessary for New Delhi’s development. South Asia, home to nearly two billion people, cannot afford perpetual hostilities.

Read More