International

Tehran Matters

The legacy of the 1979 Iranian Revolution continues to loom large over the Arabian Peninsula.

By Muhammad Arslan Qadeer | December 2024

Tehran Matters
The overthrow of the Iranian monarchy in 1979 and the establishment of the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Khomeini remains one of the most seismic shifts in the geopolitics of the Middle East. This revolution did not just mark the end of the Shah’s rule; it fundamentally altered the region’s balance of power and injected a new ideological dimension into Middle Eastern politics. The shockwaves of the revolution rippled across the Arabian Peninsula, posing an existential challenge to the conservative, monarchic regimes of the Gulf. Tehran’s vision of a regional order driven by a distinct Islamic ideology positioned it as a formidable challenger in the eyes of Gulf leaders, setting the stage for a geopolitical struggle that continues to shape the political landscape of the Middle East.

Before delving into Tehran’s geopolitical ambitions, it is critical to understand the profound transformation that occurred within Iran in 1979. The revolution was not just a political upheaval but a cultural and ideological metamorphosis that sought to overturn centuries of monarchy and secularism. The Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was deposed after decades of autocratic rule backed by Western powers, particularly the United States. His regime, characterized by rapid modernization, secularism, and close ties with the West, stood in stark contrast to the vision championed by Ayatollah Khomeini and his followers.

Khomeini’s Islamic Republic was founded on the principles of Wilayat al-Faqih—the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist—a doctrine that positioned a religious leader at the helm of state affairs, intertwining religion and politics. This ideology represented a break from Iran’s past and a challenge to the status quo in the wider region. The new Iranian leadership sought to inspire and export its revolutionary ideals beyond its borders, viewing the monarchy-based regimes of the Arabian Peninsula as incompatible with its vision of an Islamic order.

The early years of the Islamic Republic were marked by a vigorous attempt to export the revolution. This was not merely rhetorical but grounded in realpolitik and ideological conviction. Khomeini’s regime saw the Gulf monarchies—Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and others—as relics of a Western-dominated, un-Islamic order. These regimes were perceived as puppet states, propped up by American and European interests, maintaining stability at the expense of genuine Islamic governance.

The Shia-Sunni divide sharpened the ideological rift between Tehran and the Gulf regimes. Iran, as the largest Shia-majority state, positioned itself as the protector of Shia communities in a region dominated by Sunni rulers. This religious dimension added fuel to Tehran’s challenge to the legitimacy of Gulf monarchies, many of which had marginalized their Shia populations. For Tehran, empowering Shia communities and movements was a matter of solidarity and a geopolitical strategy to extend its regional influence.

The Gulf monarchies quickly perceived the ideological threat posed by post-revolutionary Iran. The Iranian revolution served as a wake-up call for these regimes, pushing them to seek security guarantees from external powers while simultaneously tightening their internal grip. The establishment of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in 1981 was a direct response to the Iranian threat. The GCC served as a defensive alliance aimed at collective security and political coordination among the Gulf states.

Saudi Arabia, as the most influential Gulf monarchy and the spiritual leader of Sunni Islam, viewed Iran’s revolutionary zeal as a challenge to its religious and political authority. Riyadh began counterbalancing Tehran’s influence by bolstering its relationships with the West, particularly the United States. The Carter Doctrine of 1980, which declared that any attempt by a foreign power to gain control of the Persian Gulf would be met with American military force, was primarily motivated by fears of Iran’s regional ambitions. The American military presence in the Gulf—seen by Tehran as evidence of imperialism—was welcomed by Gulf monarchies as a necessary bulwark against Iran’s expansionist ideology.

Perhaps the most significant geopolitical event in the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution was the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988). Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, with tacit support from Gulf monarchies and Western powers, launched an invasion of Iran, hoping to capitalize on the post-revolutionary chaos and curb Iranian influence. The war, which lasted nearly a decade, was a brutal conflict that drained both nations of resources and resulted in massive casualties. However, the war also showcased the Gulf regimes’ willingness to back any regional actor that could serve as a counterweight to Iran’s revolutionary fervor.

Read More

2 thoughts on “Tehran Matters

  • December 5, 2024 at 10:20 am
    Permalink

    Muhammad Arslan Qadeer’s Tehran Matters is an insightful and masterfully articulated exploration of the enduring impact of the 1979 Iranian Revolution on the Middle East’s geopolitical dynamics. The article’s meticulous breakdown of complex historical, ideological, and political threads highlights the author’s deep understanding of the subject matter. Qadeer’s ability to weave together decades of history into a coherent narrative is nothing short of remarkable, offering readers a nuanced perspective on how the Iranian Revolution continues to shape the Arabian Peninsula. His analysis transcends mere historical recounting, providing a lens to interpret current geopolitical tensions and ideological struggles in the region.

    One of the article’s most compelling aspects is its ability to illuminate the practical implications of Tehran’s ideological ambitions for the Gulf monarchies. By delving into the principles of Wilayat al-Faqih and the ideological exportation of the revolution, Qadeer effectively demonstrates how Iran’s vision reshaped the region’s political landscape. The connections drawn between these ideologies and real-world conflicts, such as the Iran-Iraq War and proxy battles in Yemen and Syria, are both insightful and thought-provoking. Furthermore, Qadeer’s emphasis on the religious dimension of the Shia-Sunni divide adds depth to the narrative, illustrating how ideological and geopolitical factors intertwine to create enduring regional challenges.

    This article is not just an academic or theoretical exercise; its relevance to contemporary Middle Eastern politics is strikingly evident. From the creation of the Gulf Cooperation Council to the Abraham Accords, Qadeer skillfully ties historical events to modern responses, emphasizing the article’s applicability to understanding ongoing conflicts and alliances. By shedding light on the Gulf states’ evolving strategies to counter Tehran’s influence, such as forging new partnerships with Israel, Qadeer provides a roadmap for interpreting future developments in the region. His comprehensive analysis makes Tehran Matters a superb contribution to Middle Eastern studies, offering readers both an enriching historical perspective and practical insights into the region’s ongoing geopolitical struggles.

    Reply
  • December 15, 2024 at 8:22 am
    Permalink

    The writer has rightly reflected the geopolitical & regionals developments with a clear background of events since 1979.

    Various alliances in the region over the years has been truly described .

    Reply